The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Still, lots of Britons will obsess about what would please the Eurovision viewer voting public. But when it's candidate selection time, the two attitudes collide, and out comes a third-rate singer who doesn't play any current British but an imagined Eurovision style. Then comes the competition, and everyone jokes around venomously with the lead of Terry Wogan, but secretly (or not so secretly) still cheers for the British candidate, will construct elaborate conspiracy theories about political voting (though by last year, I had to notice this spreading out East of Britain) and is immensely hurt by zero points.
I observed this process every year when I had BBC on cable television, and then saw the public/media reaction on news sites and discussion fora. Say, life will stop on the Guardian forums and dozens of users will state how much they don't care about the show, but Sweden ten points. It's funny (unlike Wogan when watched for a longer time, so I preferred the inanity of the German and Hungarian TV commenators), and a paradox reason I think Britain is very much part of Europe.
(On all the same topics, also see my 2006 and 2007 Eurovision diaries.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
Frankly we aren't surprised when we don't get points because we were truly awful and deserved that. we do however comment on the political voting of some countries, who seem to have an alliance with their neighbours and of course after Blair and Iraq and all of that, no wonder Britain gets nil points, even with a shit song. Ad astra per aspera
Oooooh boy. I don't think it's gotten any worse over the years. But it doesn't seem to have gotten any better either.
Has the UK won since:
these people? (Who still seem to be going, more or less.)
I may have been confused by the fact that they were a proper band before they entered.
Then you proceed to give the explanation:
everybody I know then goes around complaining about the chattering classes who waste their money voting on these things and pick the worst entry for us.
That's a strange voting/not-voting behaviour, aint' it.
we do however comment on the political voting of some countries, who seem to have an alliance with their neighbours
I know. But that comes from taking "Song Contest" too seriously. The explanations are that (1) this is not a serious musical contest (it is more a family get-together and a party), (2) there are regionally popular tastes in music, (3) some competitors market themselves in other, culturally close countries (especially if language is shared) already before the Final, (4) some countries have large minorities connected to a neighouring one, representing an enhanced 'market' in the prior senses. (I find it notable that apparently, the British candidates aren't pre-marketed even in Ireland.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by ARGeezer - May 24 4 comments
by DoDo - May 25 1 comment
by DoDo - May 23 43 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 15 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 251 comment
by ARGeezer - May 244 comments
by DoDo - May 2343 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1615 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 341 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments