European Tribune

Display:
The simple act of electing him obviously doesn't change anything in practice.  And, really, there's not a whole hell of a lot he can do on education at the federal level, because schools are generally controlled at the local level.  That's problematic, because obviously the parents of low-income students don't have time to be involved in school district meetings.

It'll be difficult to think in terms of "us" and "them" if he's elected, but more so because I think the "them" would view it as having finally arrived in "Mainstream America" (whatever that is).  It's more difficult to treat blacks and other minority groups as "others" when the president is a popular black guy with what most Americans will likely hear as a very African- and kind of Islamic-sounding (especially if you add in the Hussein) name.  Even more so if his Veep is Bill Richardson, who's half-Latino.

It changes Americans' perspective of how they view America.  "E Pluribus Unum" kind of stuff, I guess.  And it potentially helps in the country's view of the world by making the country knock off the subconscious "(white) America vs Scary Brown PeopleTM" thing that I do think infects people's perspective to some degree, especially if Obama adopts a more integrated, internationalist approach compared with the past.

The danger, of course, would be that issues primarily affecting poor kids from non-white backgrounds might be ignored by whites even more, because "We elected a black president."  It could be more difficult to shine a light on racial and ethnic inequality, which is why electing him has to be backed by substantial changes in domestic policy.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Sun May 11th, 2008 at 03:40:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
schools are generally controlled at the local level.  That's problematic, because obviously the parents of low-income students don't have time to be involved in school district meetings.

It's a friggin' vicious circle of deprivation, isn't it?

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon May 12th, 2008 at 05:52:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Mon May 12th, 2008 at 10:30:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Good point about local control, and a good illustration of the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" nature of the education dilemma.
More direction from Washington has been pretty discredited, not only because of the conservative meme of "If I did it, they can do it--move on."
But because NCLB has been such an unqualified disaster, and because of mythological "state's-rights" issues.
Yet unless there is a policy change of sweeping proportions,(spelled "central policy") not much will get better.

"There is mysterious music in democracy, when people decide to believe in themselves." ---Bill Greider, The Nation.
by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Tue May 13th, 2008 at 12:20:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Dancing in the Streets
by rdf - Dec 4
1 comment

On Rhetoric
by rg - Dec 3
84 comments

Me and my son, a Shministim
by shergald - Dec 4
3 comments

Electric Cars for Everyone - Tomorrow
by gmoke - Dec 4
4 comments

Bugger Thy Neighbour
by redstar - Dec 3
264 comments

So, Ideology is Dead. So now what ?
by ValentinD - Nov 26
648 comments

Not quite the 'perfect fix'?
by djhabakkuk - Dec 3
4 comments

Georgia on my mind...[Updated]
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3
22 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series