You don't have to depend upon human cooperation or anything. Kill them off with bombs ... the Iraq model. Kill them through starvation ... the Africa model. And a host of other methods coming on line as I type this.
Time to embrace DEATH, the time honored solution to overpopulation by any species.
What?! You think humans deserve better? Please explain without fifty references to some bullshit religion, God this, Christ that, blah blah. You're talking to a Ph.D. scientist, not some half-wit.
Make it good. When the music's over, turn out the light. Jim Morrison, the doors
"your moderate, mealy mouthed, equivocating comments"
I've been shamingly sober for the past few months and therefore have been acting/typing in a "socially acceptable" manner. That is rapidly changing.
Second;
"look after the living and people won't have to die so much"
The problem ISN'T I'm not looking after others, the problem is that the ultrawealthy Cheney-ites treat everyone else like processable cattle and that will continue. Other than the final peace of death, what REALISTIC alternatives exist for the non-ultrawealthy?
Let's have a Soylent Green alternative. Euthanasia processing centers. Sign me up! When the music's over, turn out the light. Jim Morrison, the doors
If you intend to go on posting here, please make sure that doesn't change too much. When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
I am sure that the rich have some extensive eugenic, mass die-off, cleansing schemes.
But those don't really count as a solution. In fact the opposite.
True, but recall that the cattle voted the Cheney-ites into power. That's not quite the same situation as in 18th century France or 19th century Russia, where significant revolutions took place...
