Display:
Victory is ours!

Chicago repeals foie gras ban

Chicago's aldermen showed Wednesday that they have had their fill of the ban on foie gras and made it legal once again for city restaurants to serve up the delicacy made from duck and goose liver.

Mayor Richard Daley, who had once dismissed the ban as "the silliest law the City Council has ever passed," squelched debate on the measure and commanded the council to vote. Looming above the council at the dais, his arms crossed and his gaze stern, he ignored the repeated, shouted objections of the ban's sponsor, Ald. Joe Moore (49th).

After the 37-6 vote, Daley seemed weary of the topic, as he noted the widespread attention that the ban has brought to Chicago since its passage.

"There's been extensive, extensive, extensive debate on this," Daley told reporters after the council meeting. "This has been talked about, debated about constantly by international, national, local press, media, by the whole hospitality, culinary field, all of it . . . This has been going on forever."

(...)

Moore spent hours Wednesday in hushed conversations with fellow aldermen on the council floor and in the antechamber. The only five who stuck with him in defiance of Daley were Toni Preckwinckle (4th), Ricardo Munoz (22nd), Ed Smith (28th), Scott Waguespack (32nd) and Rey Colon (35th).

After the vote, Moore spoke briefly and warned his colleagues that what happened to his measure "tomorrow could happen to you."

In a caustic voice, the mayor shot back: "Thank you, Ald. Joe 'Foie Gras' Moore."

City Hall.  Hard at work.

FWIW, while Moore is a frequent interloper in my circle, I'm squarely with the Mayor on this one.  

"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.

by poemless on Thu May 15th, 2008 at 10:55:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I do not consider this a victory. What is so great eating about a sick liver after maltreating animals?
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu May 15th, 2008 at 11:09:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not squeamish about the idea that, for us to eat meat, animals have to die but like the debate over free-range chicken that was promient in the UK earlier this year, we owe these animals a modicum of respect during their lives.

The process of force feeding geese to make foie gras  is self-evident mistreatment bordering on cruelty and seems to be done simply to maximise profit. I have tasted foie gras and it isn't any better to a normal pate imo. Knowing what is involved I will not eat it again and, whilst it may seem prissily politically correct, to ban the product of a cruel practice was a good thing.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu May 15th, 2008 at 11:42:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I agree about owing them respect during their lives.  Sadly, the law only concerned itself with what could be done with them once they were already dead.  

"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
by poemless on Thu May 15th, 2008 at 12:38:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This is why there is an important part to play for my plans of humane foie gras... Just put cannabis in the duck feed, watch them stop moving and get the munchies and overfeed themselves. Then kill and cook. Hopefully some of the fat soluble canabonoids will end up in the fatty liver for a nice buzz!!
by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Thu May 15th, 2008 at 01:42:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That's not what this is about.  This is about the role of government and who dictates what you can and cannot eat.  

"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
by poemless on Thu May 15th, 2008 at 12:22:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's very, very yummy. Plus this is fake animal rights stuff.  Nobody seriously proposes that we insist on free range eggs, chickens and other animal products because that would make them a lot more expensive. Foie gras on the other hand is an elitist latte eating arugula drinking food, and it's even got a frenchy name. Perhaps if we called it 'freedom liver'...
by MarekNYC on Thu May 15th, 2008 at 12:28:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
if you've ever seen a cattle feed lot or a chicken coop (none of that free range hogwash, which is a low percentage of total) you'd realize the absurdity of claiming foie gras/cruelty.  

Also, geese are assholes.  Fuck 'em.

by paving on Thu May 15th, 2008 at 06:30:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I mean, look at the way cows and chickens and all matter of animals are treated in factory farming.  If this was about caring about the animals, they'd close down all of the McDonalds and most the the supermarkets in the city.  This was about one person-whom I personally know-using this issue to gain fame and notoriety.  This was never about caring about the treatment of animals.  Foie Gras is not even produced in this city.  The ban was on serving it at restaurants.  In America - this is generally not considered the role of government.  They can regulate the factory farming industry and enact laws to protect animals.  But this law had nothing to do with that.  This was only about what you could legally order at a restaurant, at a handful of restaurants at that.  It in no way was wide-scale enough to have any impact on the treatment of animals in the production of food.  It was a strategy to get one man's name on the political map.  And it worked, but it backfired.  Because in a city where kids are being shot everyday, where the infrastructure is crumbling, where the schools are failing, the people passing laws are arguing about what appetizers resaurants should serve.  In a city of 3 million people, few of whom will ever eat the stuff, it's an embarassment.  There is an overwhelming concensus, even among vegetarians, that this is not what our city government should being focussed on!

"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
by poemless on Thu May 15th, 2008 at 12:36:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series