Quite the contrary, while there are some nice-sounding ideas (let's see if they make it through the Commons), there doesn't seem to be any direction at all in Brown's thinking.

Honestly, I don't see how he recovers from the 10p catastrophe.  How do you argue for helping low-wage workers with savings when you just raised their income taxes?

Brown's vision is essentially that of a less coherent, and mildly retarded, Alan Greenspan.

Where's your motherf*%&ing flag pin?

by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Wed May 14th, 2008 at 11:15:18 AM EST
I'm not clued up on the details but there is some discussion of bringing in compensatory measures for those affected by the 10p tax thing. But still...

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Wed May 14th, 2008 at 02:14:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Americans have the idiom "to turn a corner."

And we all know what happens when you turn four corners in a row :-P

- Jake

And yes, we in Europe might get bread and circus, but in the US I'm not sure, if they haven't somehow managed, to make only circus, but no bread.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed May 14th, 2008 at 11:45:23 AM EST
Reducing civil servants and introducing 'regulatory budgets' is following the ideology of the limited state, which means less regulation and more market. But hilariously, he even gets it wrong anyway but setting up entirely abitrary limits. The idea that 'some' state is good, but 'too much' is bad, and that there is a definite dividing line between the two sets himself up to satisfy neither side.

Member of the Anti-Fabulousness League since 1987.
by Ephemera on Wed May 14th, 2008 at 11:51:04 AM EST
We certainly have too much State in the UK, and mostly the wrong sort, so getting rid of some of it wouldn't be bad.

But he's not going to be cutting jobs at the Treasury and making Treasury seat-fillers accountable.

So we'll probably see yet more spending on consultants who cost a fortune and whose answer to saving money is to offer yet more consultancy.

Brown's tragedy is that this heart is more or less in the right place, but he's completely lacking in either the vision or the charisma needed to create any positive changes which aren't trivial and superficial.

Savings schemes for low income earners is a good 'un. As prices on everything go up, there's going to be plenty of opportunity to use those to the full.  

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed May 14th, 2008 at 11:56:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's the thing, he's ignoring the debate about how big the state should be or what its functions are, and instead skips to 'results' of fewer civil servants and less regulation.

Member of the Anti-Fabulousness League since 1987.
by Ephemera on Wed May 14th, 2008 at 12:08:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
European Tribune - LQD: UK New Sense of Direction??
a savings scheme for eight million low earners

The problem is that none of the poor sods has anything to  "save" any more.....

European Tribune - Comments - LQD: UK New Sense of Direction??

The PM pledged more help for first-time buyers,

....while any subsidies to first time buyers merely serves to prop up already daft land prices.

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Wed May 14th, 2008 at 11:58:42 AM EST

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series
Agriculture
by afew - Sep 2

Anglo Disease
by Migeru - Sep 2