Display:
If the conditions and experiences of life never grow broader than that, it's hard to see how. After all, the "left" exists because of, in part, a desire to alter the scheme of things. If your "scheme" is just peachy--then it is only empathy that will motivate you to take risks for others from a position of comfort.

In my case, there was a structure of interest as a result of my father's background as a historian, and his teaching. The dialog and actions I became involved in were a result of the Viet Nam war. It was, I thought, a real cause, a non-hypocritical one. I was -- young.
As you may remember from other diaries, the tear gas-goon squad incident was real, and it was me in that alley.
That did it.
Not suggesting that that's the only way.
I do believe, however, that without empathy- the ability to sense and sympathize with another's joy or pain- any "left dialog" is hypocrisy.

If it's all just mechanistic word-play, symbol-chess, it's empty.


Capitalism searches out the darkest corners of human potential, and mainlines them.

by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Sat May 17th, 2008 at 09:30:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Empathy doesn't come from tear gas.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat May 17th, 2008 at 11:54:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
(Oh god this discussion again.)

Emotional entanglement (empathy) can lead to just as vacuous a response, "You're starving?  Let's have a Group Hug"  as arid intellectualism, "You're starving?  That means you're in the lowest economic status of your age cohort."  

Both, carried to extremes, are mechanisms of Avoidance.

by ATinNM on Sat May 17th, 2008 at 01:06:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series