Maybe may second example is really a bit hypothetical. The first I don't think to be hypothetical at all.

Berlusconi, Murdoch & CO own shares of the media market, which are huge and were partially not build up organically, but bought together. Nothing would have spoken against forbidding them to buy so large shares of the media market. In Germany the ProSieben-SatEins Media AG (TV), could not be sold to the Springer ("BILD") publishing company, because they already have so much market share with newspapers. That would even work, if those media networks were profitable (what I think they are). As in case of Murdoch we are speaking of a stock corporation (?), how would you value the corporation for the wealth tax anyhow? Isn't the stock market value, which will be low, if the earnings are low, the best measure for the value of a stock based corporation?
My personal opinion is, that strong public media is the best remedy for such kind of opinion manipulation. Of course there has to be a layer between the politicians and the media. ARD/ZDF in Germany work rather good. I think BBC in UK is as well OK, but has already a bit more problems to keep itself out of reach of politicians

Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den Menschen
Volker Pispers

by Martin (weiser.mensch(at)googlemail.com) on Sat May 17th, 2008 at 10:40:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Martin:
Nothing would have spoken against forbidding them to buy so large shares of the media market.

Except when you already own that much of the press all you have to do is threaten politicians with a negative campaign if they don't pass your favourite 'liberalising', legislation and their careers will be over.

This is part of what happened in the US with media deregulation, and part of what happened in the UK - although Thatcher already had press support before the election, and didn't need to be convinced to hand over democracy to a press thug like Murdoch.

Martin:

As in case of Murdoch we are speaking of a stock corporation (?), how would you value the corporation for the wealth tax anyhow? Isn't the stock market value, which will be low, if the earnings are low, the best measure for the value of a stock based corporation?

It's all Capital Gains and/or Inheritance, both of which are taxed leniently in the Anglo countries, especially on large estates.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sat May 17th, 2008 at 12:38:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series