Display:
I think the key here is that there's a difference between excessive transport of food and transport of food. What we have now is excessive transport of food with over-centralized production, resulting in a system that's incredibly dependent, in every way, on fossil fuels. Localism is an overly extreme backlash, but perhaps an extreme backlash is needed to reign in the insanity at the other end of the scale.

Ultimately, I suspect you'll be proven right. Bulk staples and other things that store well will be centrally produced using sustainable methods in places where it makes sense to do so, and shipped slowly to the places that need to consume them. Spices and other low-volume, low perishability items probably fall into the same category. What needs to stop is the central industrial production and long-distance high-speed transport of perishables - meat, fish, vegetables, fruits, dairy, etc.

by Egarwaen on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 06:51:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Agreed.  Things like coffee and tea have been long-distance export items for thousands of years, and there's no reason that can't continue.  Wine and liquor as well.  Sugar too, I suppose, although we definitely ought to cut back on sugar consumption in general.
by Zwackus on Fri May 30th, 2008 at 05:47:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In Europe we could go back from cane sugar to beetroot sugar (though when discussing biofuels afew mentioned that beetroot cultivation has a high impact on water and soil resources).

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri May 30th, 2008 at 06:07:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series