European Tribune

Display:
Perhaps the Hotel/Casinos have a business model that concentrates on getting visitors into their hotels and keeping them there until they are out of money.  All of the newer constructions include entertainment and dining. Perhaps all would make more money if visitors could freely or inexpensively transit between attractions; perhaps not.  Their existing monorail system should give them some idea.  The really responsible approach would be to extend light rail to the suburbs so as to facilitate the commutes of staff.

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.
by ARGeezer (argeezer a in a circle yahoo dot com) on Wed May 21st, 2008 at 04:13:53 PM EST
The really responsible solution is not building cities in places where walking a kilometre is to tough to do ; and then, moving working hours out of the way of the hottest hours of the day...

Auferre, trucidare, rapere, falsis nominibus imperium; atque, ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Wed May 21st, 2008 at 07:14:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The really responsible solution is not building cities in places where walking a kilometre is to tough to do ; and then, moving working hours out of the way of the hottest hours of the day...

That sort of rules out the majority of the US - at a minimum New York and everything south of it on the East Coast, Chicago and everything south of it in the Midwest, the entire Southwest... Add in wintertime and we've eliminated everything except the Pacific Coast. Outside the US this rules out Latin America, Africa, South Asia, and the Middle East. Most places aren't lucky enough to have the northwestern European climate of mild summers and mild winters.

by MarekNYC on Wed May 21st, 2008 at 07:37:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I was a bit cheeky. But there are ways to do city building, even in hot areas, that contrast to LV : the Strip seems to be a heat accumulator ; such a large avenue will raise temperature, compared to narrower streets with lots of shade. Large water expanses will also lower temperature, and building in valleys will welcome wind too. Also, a long strait line is good for cars, but absurd for walking around (it increases travel length).

Also, the American custom of having air conditioning on all the time, everywhere prevents people from seasoning to the heat : when there was hot temperatures in France, people died in the North where such temperatures were unusual, not in the South were people were accustomed to it. Also not helping adaptation to heat is the modern insistence on not adapting the way of life, from architecture to dress code to, as I said, work hours, to the climate.

Auferre, trucidare, rapere, falsis nominibus imperium; atque, ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Wed May 21st, 2008 at 08:25:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I absolutely agree that the US cities built in the automobile era are generally laid out horribly. As far as AC goes, I partly agree. Humidity is a major factor in much of the US which makes things feel much worse. And in the Southwest, it may be dry heat, but it is really, really high - that French summer would be considered cool down there.  But one can believe that some AC is a good idea while also thinking that the US goes way overboard. Someday perhaps all those American businesses will decide that keeping the temperature lower in the summer than in the winter doesn't make sense (I routinely pack a sweatshirt when I'm out in summertime heatwaves). And that excess of AC does make many of us less resistant (though again that deadly heatwave isn't unusual for us).  I've also occasionally wondered if window design has something to do with the prevalence of US residential AC - it's much easier and cheaper to install AC in an old (1860's) building like mine than in the equivalent one in Europe. In remember that during that summer my parents were saying that if they had US style windows they would have happily shelled out the couple hundred bucks for a window unit. I suspect they weren't the only ones.
by MarekNYC on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 02:07:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The really responsible solution is not building cities in places where walking a kilometre is to tough to do...

That sort of rules out the majority of the US...

Either the first settlers were very irresponsible, or global warming (at least in the cities) crept quite a distance...

Are we really to suppose that summer temperatures in the biggest cities (like LA, Tokyo, etc.) were just as unbearable 100 years ago, without any air conditioning? Could it be that everyone is just afraid to announce comparative statistics?

by das monde on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 12:57:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Ummh, no. What's happened is two things - first of all the massive growth of Sunbelt cities relative to the old urban centers of the northeast and midwest, something which wouldn't have happened without the invention of AC.  There's also the ability of people to avoid extreme discomfort courtesy of technology and affluence. AC use is skyrocketing in China not because of global warming but because of rising urban incomes.  Americans take it way overboard but that's nothing to do with climate change. (My basic criteria for using heat and AC at home are can I be comfortable dressed in an undershirt, shirt, sweater, long pants and warm slippers; can I be comfortable dressed in shorts, sandals and shirtless or in a t-shirt depending on whether I've got company - if not, on it goes)
by MarekNYC on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 02:14:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"Either the first settlers were very irresponsible, or global warming (at least in the cities) crept quite a distance... Are we really to suppose that summer temperatures in the biggest cities (like LA, Tokyo, etc.) were just as unbearable 100 years ago, without any air conditioning?"

Most of the southwestern U.S. was settled after A/C was invented. LA only passed the 1 million mark in the 1920s, and places like Tucson and Denver were quite small until the 1950s.

by asdf on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 02:16:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Having lived in Tucson, Arizona for several years, both while at University and while working I can tell you that there is a great advantage to working during the hottest part of the day: your employer pays for the air conditioning.  

By the way, while Tucson does have impressively hot summers, it is, in fact, dry.  Sitting outside, in the shade with a light breeze is comfortable at air temperatures that are below body temperature.  Midnight on the desert was delicious.  From October to April the climate is hard to beat.  And snow on the face of the desert...sometimes alights and lingers.  The natural beauty of the place can be stunning. There is natural beauty around Las Vegas, but one has to travel a ways to find it.

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.

by ARGeezer (argeezer a in a circle yahoo dot com) on Wed May 21st, 2008 at 08:05:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
moving working hours out of the way of the hottest hours of the day

In the meantime, the Spanish government wants to get rid of the siesta/long lunch break and the August screeching halt...

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 07:23:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
23 comments

In Defense of the Electoral College
by danps - Nov 22
2 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
20 comments

jitter noise rumble
by emilmoller - Nov 19
18 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
32 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
122 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
20 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
58 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series