Display:
Only over Darfur and Zimbabwe.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 12:25:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I fail to see how your commet applies even remotely to Darfur or Zimbabwe.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 12:44:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It was a reference to your comment about a "neocon moment", not about the Mideast.

And as I clarified, I believe an invasion, an armed robbery against the UAE or KSA would not only be immoral but also stupid, which is why I think it might very well happen.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 12:49:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But I was referring to your comment about preventing "wealth transfers to producing countries".

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 04:13:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, I see.

Well, you are right that that doesn't have much to do with Darfur or Zimbabwe. I guess that's why no one has intervened...

No oil=no intervention.

Why, there is oil in Chad... And French and Swedish troops are deployed there. What a surprise.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 04:20:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That one was mine. I really don't see any benefit in enriching Saudi Arabia or Iraq through the primary sector.
by Francois in Paris on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 04:23:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series