Display:
was, from the start, to increase European (starting, of course, with: French) food production - in the early years to alleviate very real shortages. So it was always productivist and not particularly favorable to small farmers.

As the milk "lakes" and butter "mountains" grew, incentives have been changed, with subsidies moving away from production volumes to land area, and away from outright export subsidies.

France protects its high quality food sector via the AOC (appellation d'origine contrôlée - controlled origin denomination) mechanisms which allocate specific areas to specific products, with more stringent standards and ruthless trademark protection.

The CAP was designed for France, to a large extent, but producers in other countries have adapted to (and adopted) it and, if you look at the size of countries, France get fewer subsidies now than most of the big countries.

So, anyway, the explicit goal of CAP was "efficiency", and it has worked in that respect, so the Economist article is quite entertaining to read, of course.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 02:36:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I have to give them credit for high-quality food. Every meal, every 'sandwich' from the market or the boulangerie, every croissant and baguette from the patisserie was somewhere between 'quite good' and 'excellent' during my visit. I can't say the same here, even though we're careful about the food that we buy and where we eat.

paul spencer
by paul spencer (spencerinthegorge AT yahoo DOT com) on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 04:43:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series