Display:
Not pro or notably expert on compositions, but I'll add some subjective opinions anyhow ...

I like the colour balance in the second and third, and the tree best in the fourth, but am I allowed say I don't like any of them for the tree? It never seems, to me, to rise about the level of distraction rather than compositional element. I think it might be better to either eliminate the tree or pull back  a little to include all of it in the composition. Moving the  horizon line a bit higher wouldn't hurt either - I think it needs a bit more mass against the sky.

I'm thinking of something like:

Now, whether such a composition is possible is another matter.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sat May 24th, 2008 at 02:01:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
thanks colman. sorry i didn't reply earlier, internet is finally back up to dialup speed again.

as you know i'm not one that thinks sunsets need extra 'props', and the cypress has been oversold as integral cliche.

i have tried more earth to sky, but it just is so black, it seems like waste of eyeball/pixels.

perhaps if i had got there earlier and the tree hadn't been so black too...

~"When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate." Karl Jung~

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon May 26th, 2008 at 11:12:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, it is a bit done to death, but if you want it in there  there's not much you can do.

The problem I have with too little earth showing is that it makes me feel as if I'm craning my neck or that the sky is floating away.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon May 26th, 2008 at 11:17:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series