European Tribune

Display:
Ah! Then we have a misunderstanding. I was speaking about parliamentary republics with figurehead Presidents; Presidents whose role is largely to appear as an inspiring father/mother figure. Portugal, like France (and Romania and Austria and Poland) are mixed parliamentary-Presidential systems; your Presidents are not figureheads but Presidents with some real power. This is emphasized by the fact that you have them elected by the people, rather parliament or another indirectly representative body of electors. (Well OK, I am drawing a fine line here; Finland's and Slovakia's popularly elected Presidents may be called figureheads, and Portugal's may be not that much more powerful than those.)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Fri May 30th, 2008 at 06:25:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Ah, it makes total sense now. Thank you, DoDo.
You do very well in noting the variations in semi-presidential regimes across Europe.

Portuguese presidents do have some real powers, rarely used. Namely the power to throw down government and simultaneously order general elections. This has happened once - considering only the period after the 1974 revolution -, 3 years ago.
They cannot veto laws, only demand a confirmation from parliament, or question proposed law's compatibility to the constitution, which will be decided by a council of judges (Constitutional Court).

by findmeaDoorIntoSummer on Sat May 31st, 2008 at 05:27:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That sounds like not much more extensive than the powers of a figurehead President. In which case, I am curious: what would you expect from a more activist, less middle-of-the-road President? Sending back more laws to Parliament, and voicing opinions about law proposals more loudly?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Sat May 31st, 2008 at 12:26:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes. To have the right vision - i.e. to have the ability to see through the mystifications of the corporate media - and to express it frequently, EVEN if its opinions are not shared by most of the population (who cannot see through due to no stimulation of critical thinking).

Id est, to behave as a political figure, instead of someone above (or post-) politics.

by findmeaDoorIntoSummer on Mon Jun 2nd, 2008 at 05:57:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
23 comments

In Defense of the Electoral College
by danps - Nov 22
4 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
22 comments

jitter noise rumble
by emilmoller - Nov 19
18 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
34 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
122 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
20 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
58 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series