European Tribune

Display:
Really? No consequences? Then I suppose all those windmills dotting the landscape arrived there by the forces of the market, unfettered by any political aims to move the generation of electricity away from coal?

</snark>

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 03:05:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
From the German perspective he is right. The last Government decided to fade out nuclear power not coal. And German Environmentalists (and Austrian even more so) are rather focused on nuclear energy.

The plural of anecdote is bullshit.
by generic on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 03:34:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
BUND für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland: Klima & Energie (Main German environmental NGO; part of Friends of the Earth International)
Mehr als 25 neue Kohlekraftwerke sollen in den nächsten Jahren in Deutschland gebaut werden. Allen voran wollen RWE, Vattenfall, e.on und EnBW wieder in die Technik von gestern investieren. Will Deutschland seine Klimaziele erreichen, darf es keine neuen Kohlekraftwerke geben.

Kampf gegen Kohle (Campaign of the German Green Party)

Kohlekraftwerke sind der Klimakiller Nr. 1. Dennoch planen Vattenfall, RWE & Co. mehr als 30 neue Kohlekraftwerke allein in Deutschland. Gruenes-klima.de informiert und bündelt den bundesweiten Widerstand. Hilf auch Du mit und stoppe die Klimakiller. In der Rubrik "Kampf gegen Kohle" findest du die aktuellsten Informationen zum Widerstand, eine interaktive Online-Karte, alle Ansprechpartner vor Ort und vieles mehr.

Being proper greens, the German greens oppose both nuclear and coal. I have to say that the intensity of the anti-coal sentiment has increased a lot since the end of the red-green government. But even in that government, it was the SPD (especially Clement and the economy ministry) that was on the side of coal, not the greens.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 04:43:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And that is just the reason I voiced my loathing of Clement so often on ET.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 04:46:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Let's see how many of the coal plants are really build in the end. I bet any time that not more than 5 of the more than 25 planned plants will be stopped. And then they are runnung for maybe 60 years.
But if there is any left party involved in the next federal gov, then nuclear is dead in Germany.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahrg
by Martin (weiser.mensch(at)googlemail.com) on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 05:12:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Let's see. I bet just the opposite: for long I thought that these high numbers of 25, 40 coal power plants are wishful thinking on purpose (you push up market value by predicting expansion, and you gather support for the few projects you actually realise). I expect more news like this  and this and this. And the Greens (as opposed to SPD NRW) are active protesting wherever there is a project.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 06:14:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The vast German power market, controlled by mindless politicians is the wet dream of Swedish power executives. Vattenfall would so love to build half a dozen big reactors in southerns Sweden for the sole use of exporting power to Germany.

The viability of nuclear in Germany doesn't rest exclusively in the hands of mindless German politicians, but also in the hands of mindless Swedish politicians. ;)

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Fri May 30th, 2008 at 02:07:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And German Environmentalists (and Austrian even more so) are rather focused on nuclear energy.

Garzweiler II was a defeat, but it was something, I'd say.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 04:47:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It is a question of proportion. If one compares the cost of a CO2 emission certificate for the industry with the taxes on gas for driving minus a share for street infrastructure, traffic police,... then you still end up with much higher taxation of gas than of coal.

Ok, one could argue that windmill and solar subsidies are 'anti-coal', but I think that big industrial power consumers still can make a deal with a power companies to get electricity essentially at the price as it comes from a coal fired plant, so I wouldn't directly count wind as anti-coal. And nuclear... There were really enough (good) discussions about nuclear in this forum...

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahrg

by Martin (weiser.mensch(at)googlemail.com) on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 04:07:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I agree on one thing: the exemptions to "energy-intensive industries" from the Ökosteuer were a shame; but thank the Genosse der Bosse. This resulted in the nice situation that the German Railways pays the ecology tax for its electricity, while E.ON et al don't pay it for their coal power plants.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 04:58:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That is totally ass-backwards.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 05:22:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually !x#&@! Clement, then head of Northrhine-Westphalias state, also had his hand in it. (Just found an old article about him threatening to kill the ecology tax in the Bundesrat, the upper house of the federal parliament that consists of representastives of satate governments.)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu May 29th, 2008 at 06:03:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
First Snow 2008/9!
by DoDo - Nov 23
40 comments

THE LEFT, THE RIGHT, THEISM AND THE POLITICAL DEBATE...
by Lily - Nov 22
24 comments

Help oppose Sarko's three strike nonsense
by nicta - Nov 20
18 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
34 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
66 comments

So I met Bill McKibben
by SacredCowTipper - Nov 20
5 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
24 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
130 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series