Display:
*And what about the new European directive on detention of immigrants?
*Will there be a special regime for immigrants and another for 'normal' citizens?
*Where is the "habeas corpus", basis for the rule of law?
*Will there be concentration camps?

When Procrustes looks after you, you're sure to fit in.
by PerCLupi on Wed May 7th, 2008 at 02:25:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
For those interested in digging more: the European Commission's summary of the progress towards a common European Union immigration policy, and Statewatch's page on the EU asylum and immigration policy.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed May 7th, 2008 at 06:40:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I just found this at the top of the European United Left/Nordic Green Left website:
After three years' debate, the so-called "Return directive" should be voted by the European Parliament in June. In September 2007, the GUE/NGL called for its rejection in the Parliament's Civil Liberties Committee. The only political group in the EP to vote against it then, the Group maintains this position today.
The GUE/NGL opposes the directive because: the time limits for administrative detention, 18 months, are unacceptable; the protection of vulnerable people needs to be improved; the possibility of a long re-entry ban, up to 5 years, may create a threat to asylum rights; the EU should give priority to legislation on legal migration, essential for a more comprehensive EU migration policy.
There's also Statewatch on the Return Directive.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed May 7th, 2008 at 07:54:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I also found the following press release from the Slovenian Presidency: Slovenian Presidency Achieves Agreement on Return Directive in Political Trialogue with European Parliament (23.04.2008)
The Slovenian Presidency of the EU Council, chaired by Dragutin Mate, Slovenian Minister of the Interior and President of the JHA Council, managed to harmonise the compromise text of the Return Directive in the political trialogue with the European Parliament in Strasbourg today. The trialogue was conducted with Manfred Weber, Member of the European Parliament and European Parliament's rapporteur for the Return Directive, with MEPs from other political groups and with representatives of the European Commission.

Minister Mate explained: "As one of its main goals concerning the return policy, Slovenia chose the conclusion of negotiations with the European Parliament on the proposal for a return directive in the first reading. The negotiations were important, as they represented a test of the co-decision procedure in the area of migration policy and the strengthening of the process of setting up a joint EU migration policy."

It is interesting that the Council worked hard to get an agreement in first reading, they must really be interested in this directive. Going all the way to a third reading (conciliation) would have probably addded at least two years to the three already spent on it.
The proposal for the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common standards and procedures in the Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals has been discussed in EU institutions at various levels for almost three years. Germany and Portugal achieved important progress in negotiations, and the February Justice and Home Affairs Council reaffirmed the Presidency's mandate for negotiations with the European Parliament. The Slovenian Presidency of the EU Council intensively resumed negotiations with the European Parliament and during the first political trialogue achieved a compromise on most articles and completed the harmonisation today on the remainder of the text.

The proposal of the Directive is aimed at the unification of return standards and procedures and equal treatment of all third-country nationals staying in the Member States illegally. In this way the same level of rights and obligations of third-country nationals would be achieved and abuses of procedures avoided in the Member States with more favourable procedures. Minister Mate concluded by saying that the discussion so far showed that the Member States wanted to adopt an instrument which would enable an effective and just return policy, hence "... we can now optimistically expect that the compromise text will be adopted by the EU Council so that the European Parliament can approve it as soon as possible."

So, clearly, the assumption here is that the asylum policy is abused by economic migrants.

(my emphasis throughout)

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed May 7th, 2008 at 08:05:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series