Petition [EN] Pétition [FR] Petición [ES] Petiţie [RO] Ψήφισμα [EL] Petice[CZ] Petition [DE] Petizione [IT] Petycja [PL] Petitie [NL] Petíció [HU] Petição [PT] Namninsamling [SV] Underskriftindsamling [DA] Petícia [SK] Achainí [GA] Peticija [LT] Петиция [RU] Eskaera [EU] Petskribo [EO] Petició [CA] Athchuinge [GD]
The decision is unlikely to have any legal consequences for Schroeder or other members of his government but will influence the military policy-making of future administrations.
Lack of consequences. This is a problem. Not only in Germany, but also definitely in the United States. Without consequences, there is nothing to prevent the next government to doing the same thing and having it died up in courts for five years.
FDP head Guido Westerwelle hailed the Constitutional Court ruling as "historic," saying that it would keep the German army under parliamentary control and prevent it from being turned into a tool of the government.
As historic the decision may be, without consequences for Schroeder and others who gave the orders, will it really keep the "the German army under parliamentary control"?
One can only hope that a direct court ruling will prevent a future government from trying the same stunt. It takes 5 years to make it through the courts the first time, but an immediate injunction would be easier the 2nd time.
What is interesting to me is that Germany ostensively went in at the request of Turkey. Germany and Turkey are two countries who publicly were opposed to the US invasion. But they ended up playing Gunga Din for the master.
Interesting too is the AWACs mission - the Iraqi airforce had already been decimated. I want to find out that Turkey was using the Germans to keep the US out of Turkish airspace. It's a wonder that people wonder why the aristocracy lose their heads in revolutions.
