I actually wrote " I'm not sure I'd agree with 3rdcolumn's point that we demand a higher degree of proof from right wingers, we do display an impatience with them that amounts to the same thing."
My bold, you may have missed the negative. I was making a point that our impatience with right wing views makes reasoned discourse difficult as we are seen as too combative. Maybe that's splitting hairs, but ... keep to the Fen Causeway
Though I see the point as ceebs puts it below: when we are already familiar with arguments and evidence, we may challenge them less, and this may appear to newcomers as a form of bias.
Honest question: how to avoid this?
