European Tribune

Display:
Another way of looking at it is:

What would you--returned to your boyhood enthusiasms--want/be able to get in 2008?

I mean, it's not just comparing our past with our present; to test periods we need to imagine

--ourselves as we were, but brought up now.  Would life be better?  Worse?  The same?  (Part of this is also imagining growing up in different circumstances, how the society reacts with the family, now one school differs from another, etc..)

--ourselves as we are now, but moved to that past epoch: does life back then for a person of your age now compare favourably or unfavourably re: type of work, type of accomodation, state interference in your daily activities, health services etc.

For me:

--I think I would like it now, where I am, if I were growing up again.  School seems more interesting, less clumping together around one social model (there are other reasons, too); there are more things to do--so assuming I had the same interests and energy levels etc. I could get a wider range of experiences.

Of course, this new-young-me would be influenced in different ways; would I want an ipod, would I want the latest game console, which youth tribe would I belong to and how would that condition me?

--If I were placed as the adult I am now in the environment where I grew up, I think I'd be worse off.  A suburb, culture free, roads and roads--nature yes, but for an adult not so enjoyable (lots of parks and sports fields--

Heh, here's a conversation I heard between a 92 year old woman and a 35 year old woman.  I was pushing the 92 year old along the sea front.  We stopped to get an ice cream.  The 35 year old served us.  It was sunny (the first warm-enough-not-to-need-a-jacket day), there were no other customers, so we got chatting and, as they do, out came the various opinions.  The 92 year old and the 35 year old were sure things were worse now, more dangerous ("I remember skinheads, punks, mods, and heavy metallers," I said, "every weekend, fights and more fights."); then the 92 year old said,

"And those girls now getting drunk all the time!  It can't be good for them."

35 year old (sudden grin): "Oh well, I admit I did a bit of that when I was younger..."

To your lego example, there seem to be lots of science DIY kits around now, I don't know how flexible they are in their creativity (Migeru might know more about this), but....I suppose a question is: How influenced were you (or was I) by our relative peer groups, and what choices did we have--if we didn't want to be (or couldn't be) part of one group, how many others were there?  Also, how did child-adult interaction work back  then compared to now?

Ah, that's all badly expressed.  Two things I notice about the current crop of youth are:

  1. Lack of understanding of volume control--and I put this down to cars raising ambient levels, and in an unpleasant way such that kids prefer their ipods.

  2. The boys with their jeans hanging near their knees, underpants on display.  Surveys have been carried out: women don't find it attractive and yet--there it is.

For 1), the adults are driving the cars so the onus is on the adults to set and example, get out of their cars and free up social space for youngsters to run about (would also solve some of the "always watching videos/playing games" syndrome, I think)

For 2) -- A quick search through our old photo albums will no doubt demonstrate that attractiveness of male fashion, and female appreciation of said male fashion have ever been thus.  When I was, say, ten, it was Bermington Bags and Beatlecrusher shoes that were all the rage.  I'm sure I've spelled Bermington wrong--it's a word that came to my brain (along with the shoes) out of nowhere, stored in my brain all these years so I could mis-type it this afternoon--

Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.

by rg (leopold dot lepster at google mail dot com) on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 12:03:58 PM EST
I don't think either boys or girls, young men or young women, dress to impress or attract each other.   Boys dress to impress other boys with their rebelliousness.  Girls dress to impress other girls with their fashion sense, and to a lesser (perhaps) extent, their rebelliousness against their mothers' fashion sense.   As with most non-uniform human attire, I think, the primary message is addressed to the peer group.

The boys with their trousers sliding off their hips (and exposing in some cases not just underwear!) are sort of saying "Fuck you" to society, a bit, but they're really saying to their peers, "Look!  I'm saying 'Fuck you' to society!  How cool am I?"   We who were boys in the 1960s thought we were being similarly rebellious (and cool) by wearing our trousers just perched on our hipbones, instead of belted near the navel like our fathers.  Parents and teachers of that day were scandalized!  Or at least, we thought they were.

by keikekaze on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 02:59:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I have it on authority from inner city school teachers that the pants-down look originated as a gang thing, specifically, a signifier of having done prison time.  There are a variety of explanations: no belts in prison, erm, rape, and using the color of your boxers to signify your gang affiliation.  

But it became cool and everyone emmulated it.  

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.

by poemless on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 03:19:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I was always amazed at the speed with which gang baseball cap signals (colour, position on head) spread as a meme around the world.

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 03:22:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yep, thats it origin.

"I said, 'Wait a minute, Chester, You know I'm a peaceful man...'" Robbie Robertson
by NearlyNormal on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 04:38:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
i remember the first time i got on a tube (c.1964) with half a centimetre of hair over my top of my ears, and the looks of shock and awe from the little old grannies....the thrill was equally shocking to me.

later someone turned me on the french phrase 'epater les bourgeois', (turn the straights into paste, or noodles?!?), and i got that this was probably generational...

the fetishising of appearance at that age seems transcultural, as far as i can see.

i distinctly remember walking down ken high st at 14, making a mental checklist of all i was wearing, the shoes are cool, the carnaby st trousers cool, shirt not so much etc etc...

pathetic! total product of my environment...

just like the kids today...adolescence is temporary insanity, even in animals, it sure had its fun moments though!

The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it. Chinese Proverb.

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Fri May 9th, 2008 at 02:34:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Indeed. But in grumpy old man mode, I could bemoan that rebelliousness against adult society pressure for uniform blandness was superseded by giving in to peer pressure for a youth tribe uniform, with not much adult pressure remaining to rebel against - and dressing in design labels (also see Naomi Klein: No Logo) is rather bland as rebelliousness goes.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Fri May 9th, 2008 at 07:24:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I remember one day in about 1960 sitting in the backyard at my grandfather's house, we were watching the traffic go by on a new highway that had been built between his backyard and the old woods where we used to go to hunt and fish.  He told me that he had come to this very spot when the house he lived in was just built and he was just a boy, he had ridden up on his horse from an even smaller town about 5 miles away.  On that trip he had seen his first car, and he said that he used to run to see a car if he knew one was nearby.  Now (1960), he said that he would run to get away from the sound of a car.

My recollection of cars from the 60's and 70's at least, is that they were much louder than they are today.  Further, I think we searched for ways to turn up the volume, but were technologically primitive-I think of Jagger's quote "if we don't we're gonna blow a 50 amp fuse", hell, I've got an amp now that puts out more than that.

I work with kids, and the prison look-the baggy pants and underwear showing-is deplorable, but I retain this image of myself in 1969 strolling down the street in bell bottom jeans, with the seam cut along the calf and a wide swatch of paisley fabric sewn in, Ho Chi Minh sandals strapped to my feet and a Beau Brummel frilled shirt in electric blue with a striped railroad engineer cap adorning my Prince Valiant haircut.  With all that firmly in mind I try to keep my mouth shut.

"I said, 'Wait a minute, Chester, You know I'm a peaceful man...'" Robbie Robertson

by NearlyNormal on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 04:05:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Precisely.  I cannot condone the hyper-sexualization of young girls' clothing these days.  It really upsets me.  Probably in much the same way it upset my parents when I walked around at the age of 11 dressed like Madonna singing, "Like a virgin, touched for the very first time..."  I got a lot of "you are not going out of the house in that young lady!"  But it was FUN! ;)

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
by poemless on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 04:15:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Great comment, NN. The beginning reminds me of Crumb's American history strip, the one that begins with a log cabin in beautiful natural surroundings and finishes...

The last paragraph, uh, reminds me of me, 1969. For the jeans swap royal blue velvet flares, then a beige satin shirt with kind of mutton sleeves and a huge collar, a shaggy goatskin (? maybe) sleeveless jacket I bought second-hand, shoulder-length hair and beard. Keeping one's mouth shut is good policy.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 04:35:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Brother!

"I said, 'Wait a minute, Chester, You know I'm a peaceful man...'" Robbie Robertson
by NearlyNormal on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 04:36:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I remember turning up to visit the folks once, I'd hitched back from god knows where, dressed head to foot in denim, the back panel painted with the cover of a long lost 1970's comic. the sides of my head were shaved, the back of my hair dreadlocked down to my arse. the whole confection bleached blonde then died to pillar-box red. As I walked through the door, I heard a shriek from my mother and then had fifteen minutes of observations on my new (to her) hairstyle. at the end of this I thought the best approach was to visit friends and re approach the situation when she'd had the chance to get used to the idea the next day.

The next day I came back, opened the door to find not just my mother, but also my grandmother sitting there. "Oh shit", I thought, and my mother turned to my grannie and said "What do you think of what he's done to his hair" and my grandmother replied "Well I remember you with a beehive hairdo, it's no worse than that"  How to instantly become favourite elderly relative.

Life should consist in at least fifty percent pure waste of time, and the rest doing what you please.

by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 07:05:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
NearlyNormal:
y recollection of cars from the 60's and 70's at least, is that they were much louder than they are today.

And as for planes.....

We tend to forget the absolutely mind-buggering noise of a 707 taking off....

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Fri May 9th, 2008 at 03:29:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
i heard the sound of a jet airliner taking off is as loud as the whole human race chanting OM at once.

no link, sorry!

The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it. Chinese Proverb.

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Fri May 9th, 2008 at 04:38:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Apparently the jet blast at St Maartens is a major tourist attraction....

is one of loads of video's...

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Fri May 9th, 2008 at 04:54:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
However, there are much more planes, cars, as well as roads, airstrips and landing routes today - the sum total of airplane-related noise definitely increased. (Also see the news Sven brought us the other day.)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Fri May 9th, 2008 at 07:19:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
When I was, say, ten, it was Bermington Bags and Beatlecrusher shoes that were all the rage.

When I was an eighties teen later in the eighties, what was all the rage in dressing was "farmer" - that's Hungarian for jeans, from the brand name of the first fakes available. That's what the cool kinds wore (the kids of the Party members for sure). However, when I turned a teen in then West Germany, it was no more cool but the default, with specific style and brands of jeans being cool. (And I was the poor ugly furriner until I got jeans.)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Fri May 9th, 2008 at 07:31:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
First Snow 2008/9!
by DoDo - Nov 23
38 comments

THE LEFT, THE RIGHT, THEISM AND THE POLITICAL DEBATE...
by Lily - Nov 22
24 comments

Help oppose Sarko's three strike nonsense
by nicta - Nov 20
18 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
34 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
66 comments

So I met Bill McKibben
by SacredCowTipper - Nov 20
5 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
24 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
130 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series