European Tribune

Display:
Yes, I'm being serious. An overthrow of a government doesn't have to mean anything more than a new set of people in power.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 05:23:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Uhm, the end of the Soviet Union does, though...

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
by poemless on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 05:39:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Sorry, that sounded mean.  

But if something like the fall of the Soviet Union is just a "meet the news boss, same as the old boss" scenario on your book, I sincerely do not know what would constitute actual change.  And entire empire collapsed.  And entire economic system was destroyed.  And ideological war was lost.  The government was actually disolved at one point.  (maybe more.)  All the laws on the books became nullified, either literally or through lack of enforcement.  Yes, the people in power were from the same elite group as those in Communism, because that was the ONLY system before.  It's not as though democrats were waiting in the wings.  Communists became democrats.  Anyone with any qualifications to run any government entity got those qualifications from going through the Soviet system.  People use this fact to suggest that nothing really changed between Stalin and Putin.  It's like looking at a family and complaining all the children had the same parents.  Where else were they supposed to come from?  Outerspace?  There were lots of Westerners coming into the country to advise the newly democratic government. And as a result, the bloody country crashed.  People starved to death.  So you can understand why they don't really trust us to tell them how to run their country.

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.

by poemless on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 05:52:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And entire empire collapsed.  And entire economic system was destroyed.  And ideological war was lost.

Is this a series of interesting typos (And for An), or a literary construction just unfamiliar to me?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 05:56:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
LOL.  It's me typing too fast and not previewing and being a literary genius at the same time!

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
by poemless on Thu May 8th, 2008 at 06:00:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
First Snow 2008/9!
by DoDo - Nov 23
38 comments

THE LEFT, THE RIGHT, THEISM AND THE POLITICAL DEBATE...
by Lily - Nov 22
24 comments

Help oppose Sarko's three strike nonsense
by nicta - Nov 20
18 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
34 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
66 comments

So I met Bill McKibben
by SacredCowTipper - Nov 20
5 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
24 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
130 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series