Display:
The Spanish Government announced these days that will raise the issue of "equality of all religions," within the framework of secularism of the Constitution.

Yesterday, the Spanish Bishops Conference issued a document that accuses the government of the decline of believers and it stated that they should act with urgency to recover the believers.

Several bishops read a pastoral those criticizing the media, government and individuals who write X "For social purposes" rather than "Aid to the Church" at the annual statement of income.

The bishop of Valencia, García Gascó, criticized the government saying that they "may end up with the family" with its legislation, and advised to "faithfuls" to "convince not stop by materialism" and reject "that destroy marriages the family ".

The bishop of Toledo, Cañizares, charged with "handling public" to the media, the government, and citizens who write X in "For social purposes" rather than "Aid to the Church." It says that they "do not want freedom of man", because citizens can write X in both concepts ("social purpose" and "Church").

Members of the PP criticized the government saying that "Spaniards are not concerned about secularism. The government is doing demagoguery to raise these issues."

When Procrustes looks after you, you're sure to fit in.

by PerCLupi on Sun May 11th, 2008 at 01:55:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Uncannily similar to the line pushed by Cardinal Cormac O'Connor in the UK (attended the same briefings ?)

In the UK it generated this response which I think summed up my feelings

Guardian CiF - I don't believe it

Murphy-O'Connor also speaks with forked tongue when he tries to portray the Catholic Church as some persecuted institution that means harm to no one. He says the Catholic Church is caricatured as "some heartless, insular institution that wants to deny people their freedom".

Cardinal - this is not a caricature. It is the truth. Your own actions and pronouncements confirm it. You have tried to deny human rights to homosexuals, you have tried to rob women of the right to choose contraception and abortion and thereby take control of their lives, you have tried (and continue to try) to interfere with scientific research that may lead to the alleviation of enormous suffering. You have attempted to manipulate the political process by pressurising Catholic MPs. On a personal level you - and your church - try to control every aspect of your followers' lives, from telling them what to think, what to eat and when to eat it, to telling them who they can sleep with and even what they can and cannot do when they get between the sheets.

You have argued that Christian leaders should have privileged input to government policymaking. You have said that you should have unchallenged access to the BBC. You are a politician as much as a priest, but no one has elected you. It is you and your church - not secularists or atheists- which are out of step with the people of this country
.................
You ask why the government continually thwarts your will - the answer is that they are elected to represent the people, while you take your orders from an unaccountable central source in another country.

You may bleat that people no longer believe - but that is their choice and choice is the one thing that the Catholic church fears.




keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun May 11th, 2008 at 06:29:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The difference is that in the UK the Roman Catholic Church was not the official state church until 30 years ago. In fact, in the UK it is still controversial to have a Catholic PM.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun May 11th, 2008 at 07:25:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, it wasn't controversial to have a catholic PM, anymore than it would have been controversial if Michael Howard, a jew, has been elected in 2005.

The point being that I honestly have little idea what the religious views of his predecessors were, but Blair made his religiosity, his presumed piety, into an aspect of his premiership. Campbell was fooling himself when he said "we don't do god"; he might not have, but Blair did, each and every day.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun May 11th, 2008 at 07:53:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks, Helen!  That's an excellent! rebuttal to the catholic insanity and the best part is, that it's literally translatable to the Spanish ´equivalents´.

I know you are also very well read on Muslim faith.  Could you do an LQD with the rest of the article to start a religions´ series?  

Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. -Charu Saxena.

by metavision on Sun May 11th, 2008 at 07:51:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually, I think TSP is in a better position to do an islamic essay. I have read about islam, but apart from a couple of standard histories I've concentrated on specific critiques of their attitude to women, both cultural and dogmatic. I've never investigated the religion in a way that would give me a view on it as a whole.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun May 11th, 2008 at 07:58:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
criticized the government saying that they "may end up with the family" with its legislation

Just in case, that was probably intended to mean spell the end of the family or finish off the family.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun May 11th, 2008 at 08:23:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
that old warhorse!

people are getting fed up here in italy of being told how to run their families by people to choose not to create them.

but the social milestones of baptism, catechism, first communion, marriage and the last rites still rule supreme, and the church is not above using that lever shamelessly.

the catholic church, clad in their bejewelled pomp, have earned no right to speak for jesus. take away that self-vested authority, and the only christian things they do are feeding the poor, and nursing the sick, (worthy as that is), it's the proportion to their wealth and their proclivity for meddling in politics that are disturbing.

spain has a lot younger a population than italy, so it sounds like the spaniards took the vatican't's advice in bed more seriously than those residing closer to the See.

or maybe italy was just closer to chernobyl.

~Government budget deficits are not nearly as dangerous as the deficits we have created in vital and complex natural systems.~ Naomi Klein.

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Sun May 11th, 2008 at 10:01:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As PerCLupi mentioned, in Spain people are checking off the church box in their tax returns less and less, but the problem is that the church only feeds the hungry and warehouses the sick and elderly with public funds, for the most part.  

The box for 'social purposes' goes to fund NGO's and the church has created loads of them, branching out with different names, so they get the church-aid money, the NGO money, the government programs money and their followers' contributions.  Then, every time I read the NGO employment site, some church NGO is asking for volunteers to do clean-up work in some residence because they do not even pay minimum wage!

They will be better off if they STFU because that loophole may be closed sooner, rather than later.

It is enraging, but at least there are enclaves like the 'red parish' that the archbishop tried to close months ago and failed.  Right now, the '80 sacred meters' are housing 24 Bolivians that had been living in slum huts and an illegal hostel the city demolished....  

Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. -Charu Saxena.

by metavision on Sun May 11th, 2008 at 02:21:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In fact, the bishop said literally: you do not acceptable "weddings that destroy families". This is, the wedding between those who can not procreate.

When Procrustes looks after you, you're sure to fit in.
by PerCLupi on Sun May 11th, 2008 at 12:01:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
54 comments

Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
32 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9
1 comment

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
9 comments

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

Recent Diaries
Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
32 comments

Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
54 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9
1 comment

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
9 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Answers to the Renewable Energy Consultation
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 7

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Mismatch with the Natural Gas Market
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3
22 comments

The Future of Economics
by ARGeezer - Feb 2
191 comments

Desert Island Discs - Helen's distortions
by Helen - Jan 31
48 comments

Gorila
by DoDo - Jan 29
14 comments

Rail News Blogging #7
by DoDo - Jan 29
15 comments

Obama's State Of The Union: LQD
by Crazy Horse - Jan 25
74 comments

Democracy Technology
by gmoke - Jan 24
1 comment

The Hydrogen dream
by Luis de Sousa - Jan 24
49 comments

ET Paris Meet-Up 2012 (2 UPDATE)
by afew - Jan 23
113 comments

More Diaries...
Occasional Series