a) the military government did not authorize the entry of humanitarian aid, if they do not spread.
b) Statements by several nations and members of NGOs claimed that could not be trusted that the military government to distribute aid and not stay with it.
c) the prestigious professor Carrillo Salcedo has worked on the concept of international humanitarian intervention. According to him, we would be in Myanmar in a situation that could justify "international humanitarian intervention", under the authority of the UNO.
d) they raised the relationship between the "interference" in Iraq -first, eliminating the UNO, and then after the disaster, calling for the legal protection of the UNO- and the current situation in Myanmar.
e) they wondered if the UNO still had sufficient authority or the latest developments of international politics have eroded the UNO.
f) they wondered whether they should not pose a new situation of the UN: the times are far removed from the years after World War II. And also the question about the veto. When Procrustes looks after you, you're sure to fit in.
Of course, very ironical after Katrina.
And do the Burmese people actually want intervention ? Nobody seems to talk about them. They are the poor peons that got hit by the hurricane, but they hardly seem to have a voice. Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
