Display:
It has been understood that a fracture network is a self-organising system capable to operate at all scales (micro, meso, macro).
by Nomad on Mon May 12th, 2008 at 09:11:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But, moreover, probabilistic intuition trained on "regular" memoryless processes such as the Poisson process is misleading, which is where the "anomalous number of recent earthquakes" argument is coming from.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon May 12th, 2008 at 09:16:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, and a fracture is understood as a network and not a single fault?

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon May 12th, 2008 at 09:17:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Technically, a fracture is a fracture; a fault is a fracture which has undergone (tectonic) movement. Both can occur at all scales. However, a fracture network at the micro scale has the potential to develop into a fault at the meso/macro scale. Faults organize them in networks - fault zones - fractally identical to a network of micro fractures or micro faults.

One fracture is just a fracture; a single fault is derived from a network of micro/meso fractures.

by Nomad on Mon May 12th, 2008 at 09:39:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series