Display:
But that is the problem that needs to be solved and prevaricating around the bush (to quote Wallace) is not going to solve it.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jun 13th, 2008 at 07:48:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, exactly. Lisbon is a not a solution to the problem of balancing national and EU sovereignty. It may have been designed that way, but it really isn't.

You can't have (our usual kind of) democracy without the appearance of an explicit mandate. People really don't like it if you try to take that away from them, no matter how irrelevant it is in practice.

So given that Lisbon has been crafted to avoid the need for a formal popular mandate, it was never going to be acceptable.

The silliness about chipping babies and drafting them into the EU Child Zombie Flesh-Eating Radioactive Army would have been background noise if Lisbon had had a solid populist foundation.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Fri Jun 13th, 2008 at 08:14:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
For a look at how solid the populist foundation of the EU is, you just have to look at the Commissioner's blogs.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jun 13th, 2008 at 08:26:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series