Display:
If we need to go up against the USN, I think submarines would be a smarter choice. Europe is quite good at submarines, and it only takes one well-placed torpedo to send one of their aircraft carriers to Davey Jones' Locker.

We'd lose a lot of subs getting close to their carriers, sure, but a sub is what? one percent of a carrier in terms of manpower and industrial production? We can afford to lose fifty subs for every flat-top we sink and still come out ahead in terms of attrition. And we have a bigger population and industrial base to begin with.

As an aside, if the USN blockades the Atlantic, it might be more prudent to simply write off the Atlantic trade and go through the Med to SE Asia. There we can sail in our territorial waters and/or neutral waters all the way to our destination. It would hurt, sure, but I think it would hurt a lot less than arguing with a power that has 27 thousand megaton and is known to react negatively to people shooting at its soldiers...

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 at 03:46:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
We'd probably have to smoke the US' sixth fleet out of the Mediterranean first... And if that were accomplished and you tried to trade with Asia through Suez, the Indian Ocean would become a very fun place.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 at 05:31:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series