Display:
An historical

I hear your French accent even in your writing :-)

the demographic crisis was such that the ordinary man was much better off after rather than before

Is that true right into the population decline? Not after, during the new boom? I thought there was a collpase of trade and agriculture that added to the woes of city-dwellers and villagers alike.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Jun 30th, 2008 at 05:41:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually, a collapse of agriculture is good for peasants : the lands that fell into disuse were the least productive ones, marginal lands that had been cultivated because of population. Thus work was quickly much more productive, and by 1450 most land workers ate meat regularly. During the collapse, the rough times came not because of economics but because of politics, warrior bands roaming the lands, and illness with the repeating plagues.

Note that the history Migeru quoted about labourers getting better wages dates from the 1370's ; pretty much the early phase of the collapse, as population continued to decrease into the fifteenth century.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Mon Jun 30th, 2008 at 09:56:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series