European Tribune

Display:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/26/152024/105/608/542464

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 06:01:57 PM EST
The truth is that it's not a conspiracy theory to the people pushing this.  It's not even a matter of drilling off the coasts.  What we're really seeing (at least in the states), with all of this bullshit about speculators and drilling, is a Republican Party in the states desperate to connect with the electorate on something.  Faux-populism on gas prices fits quite nicely in their minds.  But now that they've figured out it's not working, I expect it'll calm down.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 08:40:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If they can look like they're doing something, while helping to further enrich their friends, why not?  
by gobacktotexas (dickcheneyfanclub@gmail.com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 09:43:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That's exactly it: Give the appearance of doing something while really doing nothing -- or, worse, while really doing something even more damaging.  American politicians and talking heads are the best in the world at it.  You actually kind of have to admire the cockiness it takes to pass some of this shit off.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 10:38:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You actually kind of have to admire the cockiness it takes to pass some of this shit off.

Sorry, I'm too busy throwing up to admire people who constantly lie -- as well as the spineless media sellouts who support these ridiculous falsehoods.

by Ralph on Fri Jun 27th, 2008 at 01:08:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Nothing to admire because there's nothing original.  Using environmental scapegoats to cover a corporate kleptocracy has been SOP for decades, whether ridiculing the blocking of dam projects because of endangered fish, thus diverting attention from the fact that the projects were complete boondoggles, or blaming spotted owls for the loss of timber jobs, diverting attention from the timber industry shipping jobs to Asia.  It's just sick that people are stupid enough to keep falling for it.
by rifek on Sat Jun 28th, 2008 at 11:10:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
the conspiracy theories are very much coming from the left.  You see diaries all over the left blogospere blaming big oil and speculators.  Chris Cook here is adamant that BP and Goldman are the key players in the game.
by HiD on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 10:46:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Quite the contrary, the conspiracy theories come from an obvious top-down round of propaganda by the right-wing nuts.  The left jumped on it after a report by Keith Olbermann.

The criticism of the speculator-driven bubble theory is coming overwhelmingly from the left and the more moderate parts of the libertarian right.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 10:49:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I spend a lot of time debunking left wing BS on this issue.  Got anything to back your contention up?

I'll offer this.  If you go to DailyKos and input "oil speculation" in the search function, you get 317 returns in diaries over the last quarter.

Many if not most have titles like:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/1/113658/9735

Yes, the high oil prices are due to SPECULATION

blaming the faceless business world for all woes is pretty classic behavior of the angry left.

by HiD on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 11:10:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I had a look at the first 150 or so.

I have to say I do not share your definition of the word "Many"; at least not as regards titles. I also note that, with the exception of mainly Jerome's diaries, "many" (my definition) of those diaries are not exactly attracting a torrent of comments.

by det on Fri Jun 27th, 2008 at 02:26:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
. . . of leftist discourse, "angry" or otherwise.  I'd guess a quarter of the people on that site are former Republicans (like the owner), fed up with G.W. Bush, but not necessarily fed up with Republican memes.  Probably another quarter are people who have only just entered into political consciousness to support Obama.

I'm just saying I'd be loath to point to DKos as un undistorted or undistorting window into leftist thought.

by keikekaze on Fri Jun 27th, 2008 at 08:45:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
but the RW blather on this subject is "we need to drill ANWR, the US conti shelf etc etc, and them tree huggers won't let us".
by HiD on Sat Jun 28th, 2008 at 05:31:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The opacity of markets, or at least data inaccessibility and barriers to understanding their operation, has always been a wellspring for neurosis of all kinds.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 11:09:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
and general stupidity.  It's just a hell of a lot easier to blame "the man" than to accept a share of the blame and have to modify your behavior.
by HiD on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 11:12:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's a lot cheaper too.
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Fri Jun 27th, 2008 at 04:08:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm saying that in all likelihood BP and Goldman have been "partnering" for the last 10 years or so to maximise their take from oil etc.

Would that be a "Conspiracy"?

Of course not: these are fine firms with the best lawyers money can buy.

Certainly I believe that markets have been much more volatile in the past - until hedge funds moved in with massive market power - than they needed to be, and that much of the huge profits made by BP and Goldman in this period were made from this.

Such trading conduct is not "speculation" - it is "acceptable" market manipulation.

I suspect - and I may well be wrong and paranoid and all of that - that a deeply opaque combination of forward sales by BP on the one hand, and speculative fund positions on the other through Goldman - may be holding the Brent/BFO complex artificially high.

As we recently discussed, it really does not take that much money to underpin prices of BFO production of 70 cargoes a month, and to hype as necessary in the Press.

Not a million miles away from the way the International Tin Council held up the tin price for years.

And if demand DOES continue to rise and/or production flatline (which is where the ITC went wrong, as high prices brought in new production) then they would be OK, and BP would be able to continue to run an interest-free overdraft against the market (if that's what they are doing, of course)

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Fri Jun 27th, 2008 at 06:02:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
whatsoever.  Therefore a conspiracy theory from where I sit.  It's not like you don't have a lot of bad feeling from your personal experience with failure of regulation.

oil is screaming because there is no way to bring it down anymore other than demand destruction.  Since people take a while to take real steps (move out of drafty old buildings with no insulation or buy a hybrid), it will take a while.  

by HiD on Sat Jun 28th, 2008 at 05:36:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Of course I have no proof: do you think they'd publish it?

HiD:

It's not like you don't have a lot of bad feeling from your personal experience with failure of regulation.

That's a presumption on your part. In the immediate aftermath - yes, I did feel as you probably would have if you'd been shafted the way I was.

That was seven years ago and a lot of water under the bridge since then.

I stopped being judgmental about them years ago. They do what they do because that's what "Profit Maximisation" and the Corporation as a legal form mandate.

I don't condemn sharks because they kill, or scorpions because they sting. It's what they do.

BP and Goldman have long had the same Chairman - Peter Sutherland - and other common directorships of long standing eg Lord Browne - Fact.

Both make very large - but opaque - amounts of money from energy trading, and have been doing so for long enough for those responsible to rise to the top at Goldman - Fact

Goldman co-created and co-funded the dominant ICE platform, and BP made the earliest and biggest liquidity commitment - Fact.

BP have a long history of dodgy trading - Fact.

Goldman - like most of the rest - were involved in the systemic manipulation of settlement prices at IPE - Fact.

Does that make the BP and Goldman relationship a "Conspiracy" ?

Well, that's what you appear to think I'm alleging.

The answer is, I'm damned if I know, but it wouldn't take much to find out.

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sat Jun 28th, 2008 at 07:19:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
very weak backup to say the least.

GS is not run by Peter Sutherland.  It's run by the same group of partners that have been in charge of the energy trading area since about 1993.  He doesn't even appear to sit as an outside director on the  main Board.

http://www2.goldmansachs.com/our-firm/about-us/leadership/board-of-directors.html

He's the titular head of the London office (Goldman Sachs International).  That's nothing like the seat of power in New York.  I doubt the energy desk ever sees the old boy.

Does that make the BP and Goldman relationship a "Conspiracy" ?

Well, that's what you appear to think I'm alleging.

Not exactly.  I find your writing on this subject to be a classic "conspiracy theorist" screed.  You can point to many links between the two, but no hard evidence of coordinated action.  When you constantly link two company names in works with titles such as "Oil Market manipulation", it's hard to believe you are not implying both illegal behavior and coordinated action.  I'll not put words in your mouth, but there's hardly any need.  You make it very clear you think they are working together.  

You also ignore the large number of other players in the game.  Do they dance  while your master manipulators call the tune?  Hardly.  The fact that both make money in the same market proves nothing.  All the long term players make money or they'd be gone.

I'll ask again.  If the BFO market is being rigged to high price levels, where is the oil going?  Why is no surplus being built up?  Is there no "peak oil" effect in play as this diary suggests?  What do you think the "real" or "fair" price of oil is?  Why are there no large differentials to the cash markets other than for super heavy sours?  Exactly how are the manipulators doing what they're doing?

As for your pointing to fiddling the settles on the screen markets.  Those work both to move the settles up and down around what the market might have been otherwise.  Players pricing in bbls try to move the market down.  Those selling, up.  There's no reason to jam prices high and keep them there.

For wet oil producers, sure they love high prices.  But even here you point out BP is structurally short.  Why would they wish flat prices to be high and stable?  They're killing their refining side for what reason?

We're at these levels because of:

  1. political tension in a number of large producers - Nigeria, Iraq, Iran, Venz.  One real blow up and the world is actually short oil.

  2. all slack in the production system is used up except perhaps some heavy sour Saudi

  3. Demand growth in India/China/other Asia is relentless.  And will stay that way unless full price rises feed through rapidly.  Even then we'll just have hiccup for a while.  5% of the world's population (USA) uses 2-25% of the world's oil.  The rest want to move up from donkey carts.

  4. Supply growth is screwed.  There are no more Saudi Arabia sized areas out there.  The Brazilian finds are large as was Sakhalin, but they're not changing the equation much.  Most large producers are in decline.

  5.  End users refuse to cut back until there is so much pain they have to.  It's not easy or cheap to walk away from a gas guzzler or a building designed when energy was free (or when people just put up with being cold).
The airline business is in deep deep trouble.
by HiD on Sat Jun 28th, 2008 at 06:18:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
HiD:
You make it very clear you think they are working together.  

I do, and I think that their relationship has underpinned their mutual profitability these last 10 to 12 years.

You clearly don't.

HiD:

What do you think the "real" or "fair" price of oil is?  

The market price is the market price. Nothing "fair" about it.

You give lots of cogent reasons why you think the high price is justified. I've said often enough I think Peak Oil is here and now.

How that translates to price, I have no idea. If the market price is being held artificially high then it will collapse - if it isn't, it won't. I guess time - and the results of the companies - will tell.

HiD:

As for your pointing to fiddling the settles on the screen markets.

The scam I blew the whistle on was seven to ten years ago: I've no idea what the games are these days.

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sat Jun 28th, 2008 at 09:15:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If the market price is being held artificially high then it will collapse

Agree

if it isn't, it won't.

Disagree - there are other possible reasons for a boom-bust cycle than market manipulation, or speculation. They all boil down to delayed feedback.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jun 29th, 2008 at 01:42:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
offer evidence for your charges then.  I see nothing that rises above wishful thinking.

The oil price could collapse if demand suddenly wanes and there's a fear it won't rebound soon.  Spec length flees.  Hedgers rush to lock in down the curve and no one buys.  We could end up in a heavily backward market as the prompt remains tight.  We'll see.  But in this scenario, a price drop does not make your case for you.

by HiD on Mon Jun 30th, 2008 at 01:24:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
is a straw man.

As you well know, I am in no position to provide any.

Sure, BP and Goldman may be just good friends.

....and I've got a bridge to sell you...

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Mon Jun 30th, 2008 at 08:55:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
what is made of straw is your argument.  You could pretty much pick any major player in the game and find similar links.
by HiD on Tue Jul 1st, 2008 at 02:31:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
See http://www.youtube.com/americansolutions

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jun 27th, 2008 at 02:42:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Newt Gingrich think tank... oxymoron.

Karen in Austin

Thence comes our true nobility by grace, It was not willed us with our rank and place. Chaucer

by Wife of Bath (bakerswife13@yahoo.com) on Fri Jun 27th, 2008 at 06:36:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
He thinks with his fuel tank...

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jun 27th, 2008 at 06:38:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Newt Gingrich think tank... oxymoron.

Nah, just plain moron.

by Ralph on Fri Jun 27th, 2008 at 01:14:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
54 comments

In Defense of the Electoral College
by danps - Nov 22
26 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
64 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
40 comments

jitter noise rumble
by emilmoller - Nov 19
36 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
72 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
244 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
116 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series