Display:
Negative for negative, I'll say this: if governments (and multilateral governmental/non-governmental orgs) can't do it, neither most certainly can corporations with their narrow focus on profit. Can anyone imagine the ruthless ethics of Monsanto doing anybody any good? And its vision of agriculture being sustainable?

There is an alternative, as I sketched out above, and it involves empowering peasant farmers so they can make a living (provide food staples, earn money) from the land while not destroying it. Half the world's active population are farmers, most of them small peasants. These people have skills and locally-adapted knowledge that can be harnessed to provide much more food than is currently the case in many poorer countries. This would keep population in the country areas and help halt the flight to the towns. (Another of your points I responded to).

Of course, if you step back and say, we haven't got democratic governments so we're screwed anyway... You know, OK, so let's all go hang ourselves.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Jun 6th, 2008 at 12:04:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Look, I'm not trying to pick a fight, I agree with your premise, but it's not enough.

For example you say "involves empowering peasant farmers " and all I say is how?

What's the plan? We know what the goals are. Where are the implementation plans?

Policies not Politics
---- Daily Landscape

by rdf (robert.feinman@gmail.com) on Fri Jun 6th, 2008 at 12:45:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Forgive me if I haven't got implementation plans right here to set out. (It wasn't really what the diary was about anyway). But I will come back to this, and develop the topic over time.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Jun 6th, 2008 at 01:09:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series