Display:
Aviation industry attacks EU emissions plan that effects airlines worldwide - EUobserver

With airlines struggling to maintain their businesses in an era of skyrocketing fuel prices, the aviation industry has attacked European plans to include its carbon pollution in the emissions trading scheme.

The head of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), Giovanni Bisignani, in a speech on Wednesday (16 July) to an international conference on sustainable aviation in the UK said: "The airline industry is in crisis. With a fuel bill of US$190 billion [€120 billion] - one third of its costs - saving fuel is a matter of survival. Still Europe is fixated on punitive measures supposedly designed to reduce emissions.

From January 2012, all flights taking off from Europe or landing there will be included in the ETS

"There is a rush to implement taxes, taxes and more taxes. They all have an environment label, but do nothing to reduce emissions," he continued.

Last week, MEPs voted overwhelmingly (640 to 30) for aviation to be included in the ETS from 2012. The plan, including both EU and non-EU airlines, must yet be ratified by the member states, who agreed to the idea in June.

"Taxes don't reduce emissions. Only better operations and technology can do that," said Mr Bisignani, lashing out at UK and Dutch passenger duties and associated taxes.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 18th, 2008 at 03:36:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
God, they're as bad as the fishermen and the lorry drivers. They all seem to think that they are entitled to free fuel forever cos they're special.

No, no, no and no.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Jul 18th, 2008 at 04:11:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"Taxes don't reduce emissions.

Yes they do, provided they are sufficient to create demand destruction. People don't fly places because they need to. They do it because they want to, and because it is fast and cheap. Cheaper than train in many cases. The airline industry need to shrink. The last thing we need is for it to grow, 'as projected', or hoped. Some airlines will go out of business. That's al right. They are not needed, and incredibly wasteful. So, recipe for the airline industry "in crisis": Increase ticket prices, reduce number of flights, lay off personnel no longer needed. It's not rocket science, damn it.
by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Fri Jul 18th, 2008 at 06:00:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Good grief.  Reminds me of the NRA slogan about how guns don't kill people, people kill people.

"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
by poemless on Fri Jul 18th, 2008 at 06:05:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There is also the aspect that the people doing the flying need to pay for their share of the destruction of the Commons.

Inspiring that this guy didn't threaten to move the industry to the Ukraine at least. But he can go sit with the cement guy anyway and they can commiserate that the days of free exploitation of the air we breathe, the views and water we need, are not to be spoilt at the convenience of commerce.

...they sound like a bunch of heroin pushers; hey, we provide jobs and are just fulfilling a demand...

Never underestimate their intelligence, always underestimate their knowledge.

Frank Delaney ~ Ireland

by siegestate (siegestate or beyondwarispeace.com) on Sat Jul 19th, 2008 at 12:58:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Glad it affects them.  

Don´t try to learn proper English from the media.

Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. -Charu Saxena.

by metavision on Sat Jul 19th, 2008 at 07:01:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series