Citing a lack of interest, the Nevada Republican Party has called off its state convention and will instead pick its delegates to the national convention by private conference call. The state party broke up its original convention in April when supporters of Ron Paul hijacked the proceedings and tried to elect delegates for their candidate to the national GOP convention in September. Party officials tried to reconvene on July 26, but they needed a quorum of 675 and received only 300 RSVPs, according to local reports.
The state party broke up its original convention in April when supporters of Ron Paul hijacked the proceedings and tried to elect delegates for their candidate to the national GOP convention in September. Party officials tried to reconvene on July 26, but they needed a quorum of 675 and received only 300 RSVPs, according to local reports.
And the wierdness keeps going and going and going ...
Turns out they were the only ones who cared.
I love it. Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
Never seen a presidential campaign this screwed-up 3.5 months away from the election.
Never seen the Democratic Party this organized 3.5 months away from a national election.
Never seen a Democratic nominee hit the ground, doing the grunt work, this hard 3.5 months from the election.
Between the GOP's and McCain's screw-ups and Obama's campaign structure and strategy we could be looking at a massive wipe-out this November.
Du da duda du, Du da duda du, WIPEOUT! (From Pipeline!)
It is starting to look encouraging. Dare we hope? As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
The Dem's have gained 700,000 registered voters and the GOP has lost 1,000,000 registered voters. That's terrible news for the GOP. Due to a little known - at least talked about - political fact. When you lose a voter to the other side you have to gain two to break-even and three to win. Like this: 50/50 goes 49/51 so 2 gets you back to 51 and 3 gets the win at 52.
I distrust national polls this far out from an election. There's just too many things that can happen, e.g., McCain dropping dead. Also, we're in the summer-doldrums when most voters are more interested in vacationing than politics.
State polls, I think, matter more at this stage. Looking ahead to the election there are two states that matter: Florida and Ohio. McCain has to carry both to win. If Obama wins both then he's got himself a landslide. Polls in these states have been swaying back and forth over the last month; Ohio seems to swing mostly Obama and Florida mostly for McCain. Watching these states, I think, will tell us who is building a solid base of support that can be expanded upon during the active campaign season -- which we are not in, yet.
I do have to point-out Obama needs the under 30 vote. This group has tended to favor Democrats in past but have not bothered to pull the lever. That's CW. But no major Democratic campaign has ever, to my knowledge, actively gone out to bring them into the campaign and actively sought their support. That's the big difference Obama is putting into the mix. With this group I don't expect them to show-up much in the polls. First, there is the known cell-phone problem. Second, their percentage of the electrate is under-represented in polling models, based on history, versus what may happen on Nov. 4. So even if they do come out, big time, for Obama the polls may not 'see' it coming.
As evidence, I offer one word: Iowa.
The cell phone issues is less of an issue these days, because groups like Gallup now poll cell phones. But, as you allude to, if they're not accounting for the proportion of the overall electorate that will be made up of young people, the polls will be skewed in St John's favor. Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
Saying you're right, do you realize what that means? We may be seeing the end of the GOP as a national political party.
It's not even close to being over, because Obama is not - you know - actually all that progressive. A few million people switching registration doesn't mean squat if there isn't a tsunami-sized policy shift.
Obama may make some paddling pool ripples - he's going to have to, to prove that he's not a slightly milder and more personable Bush II.
But there will be no tsunami. And the rot will still be there under the surface, the networks of crazies will still be dropping spores, waiting for a better time to sprout.
The youngin's will show up.
I certainly hope so. I vividly recall voting for Humpfrey in '68, my 2nd Presidential election, after having been so bitterly disappointed by LBJ after the '65 escalation in Vietnam. (I was proposing a National Day of Prayer to have millions of people praying for him to have a heart attack. Call me disillusioned.) I was NOT excited by Humpfrey, but even staying at home was not an option. California seemed in play. As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
Most of the public, who only watch tv and read republican newspapers, don't have the background to realise the spin being put in on McCain's behalf. I still see the BBC, which only reports Beltway CW, still saying that a large majority of Americans think McCain is a more credible C-in-C etc etc. keep to the Fen Causeway
Isn't this where the weird are supposed to have turned pro? Hunter would have been disappointed. As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
