Display:
Right now, it's American hegemony that's killing people - lots and lots of people. Hegemony is a more general problem.

It's not as if we don't bitch about the European contributions to the body count as well, but everyone always only complains about the insults to their own nation.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Jul 14th, 2008 at 07:56:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You do realize that the average American on the street can do little to nothing about this.  After all, all the major candidates are basically in agreement carrying a big stick and bashing other nations with it.

Obama isn't going to take US forces out of Iraq, and to be honest the likely result of a US withdrawal in Iraq is an Iraqi genocide in which the Sunnis and Kurds are knocked off.  I don't think that we're talking about something on the order of the Holocaust, but matching Rwanda or Bosnia? Sure.

So if it's the body count that matters, which one is better?

If another 100,000 die because of the occupation, but 2 million will die in the event of a genocide in the event of American withdrawal, which is morally superior?

We can't change the past, we can change the future.

And in the future, I think that it's important that the world community be listened to when there's a push for war.  So that if the thing goes to shit it's everybody's fault, and not just placed on America's shoulders.

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg

by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Mon Jul 14th, 2008 at 08:12:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
ManfromMiddletown:
Obama isn't going to take US forces out of Iraq, and to be honest the likely result of a US withdrawal in Iraq is an Iraqi genocide in which the Sunnis and Kurds are knocked off.  I don't think that we're talking about something on the order of the Holocaust, but matching Rwanda or Bosnia? Sure.

My recipe for Iraq? Declare a firm date of pullout of all troops. Give this date with enough time for all of the power factions in Iraq to pre-negotiate their relationships after the end of the occupation. Apologize to the Iraqi's, say you are very, very sorry about the state of their country. Give the option to any Iraqi who wishes to immigrate to coalition-of-the-willing countries, in case the should feel they've had enough and don't want to stick around for the occupation aftermath and possible genocides. Those people leaving should be granted immediate permanent residence in the receiving country. That way, those that stay in Iraq to try to resolve the conflict amongst the different groups will at least have made the choice to do so.

Then leave. And let the chips fall where they may. And promise not to do it again.

by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Mon Jul 14th, 2008 at 09:17:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Which is basically what's going to happen.  The deadline on having the troops out, for now, is May 20, 2010.  Obama's not going to have much choice on staying or going anyway.  His op-ed in the NYT this morning suggests he's clearly, despite the best efforts of McCain and the AP to convince us otherwise, looking to get out.

The only issue will be hammering out the details of what to do with Iraqis who want to get out, too.

MfM's assumptions are a little silly here.  The idea that the Sunnis outside of Iraq are going to sit around while the Shi'ia slaughter the Iraqi Sunnis is ridiculous.

I'm also not a big believer that the Shi'ia are going to set about trying to kill all the Sunnis and Kurds the moment we turn our backs.  I don't follow how our soldiers would prevent this either.

I'm skeptical, too, as these excuses for staying are the excuses provided by the Very Serious People who supported the war and want to stay in order to prop up their imaginary honor.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Mon Jul 14th, 2008 at 09:45:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Which is basically what's going to happen.

Except of course the part about letting iraqis emigrate to coalition countries. I do not have the numbers but recently it was reported that the swedish town of Södertälje has accepted more refugees from Iraq then the entire US. And I bet there are towns in Syria that is housing more refugees then Sweden in total.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 10:12:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
True, but that's a reflection of the current president not wanting to make it seem as though incredible numbers of Iraqis are fleeing to America for safety.  It'd kind of damage his whole "The surge is working" argument.  I think you'll find Obama more open to it (assuming, of course, that he wins).

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 06:35:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Call me cynical, but I have a hard time imagining that. Not only would it set precedents that I think the US might rather want to not set, it would also be attacked - fiercely - by his domestic opposition. I don't think that anyone in Washington thinks a million or five Iraqis are worth the political capital required to treat them decently.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 03:59:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And in the future, I think that it's important that the world community be listened to when there's a push for war.  So that if the thing goes to shit it's everybody's fault, and not just placed on America's shoulders.

No, excuse me, what's important is for America and its leaders to understand that we go to war in self-defense should it become absolutely necessary (and as the last resort), not to go looking for these God-damned ponies just because these neocon pieces of shit decides that our troops should be used to promote their magical thinking.

It's on America's shoulders, because those of us who opposed this stupid fucking war weren't fucking listened to.  The global community wasn't listened to, because the global community wasn't going to go in regardless of what fairy tale the psychos told it.  Whose shoulders should it be on?  The French?  The Germans?  They had the brains to stay out, so why the fuck would it be on their shoulders?

You're right, we can only change the future, but I, for one, am not done talking about the past, because I and others were right all along, and it's time the people who got it right were listened to in this country instead of the people all-too-willing to send other people's kids to die for nothing.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 08:57:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm afraid this isn't the way America, whose economic edifice pivots on projection of military power, works.

It's a militaristic society through and through, anyone who lives here and observes the absolute reverence of all things military by the vast majority of americans can see this. And that reverence permeates everything. We gaze in wide wonder at how the so-called 4th estate toed the line so easily in the run-up to the Iraq war, but really, it's this way with every war. Americans absolutely love their wars.

As long as they win them, they don't cost too much money and someone else's kids get killed.

Fai de bèn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant

by redstar on Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 03:10:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
About body counts...

You can't just compare collections of people by size - people are people, not beans to be counted.

Example: is it better to kill a hostage taker and a hostage to free another hostage, or to let the hostage taker kill the hostages and then kill the hostage taker?

Will you take responsibility for the choice to kill a hostage? Will you pull the trigger? How will you face the family of the hostage you killed in order to reduce the hostage death count by half?

If you're going to get the rap either way from the family of the dead hostages, better to not have blood on your hands on top of that, to be honest.

You're welcome to scale the problem from 1:2 to any ratio of dead hostages you like.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 05:18:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series