Display:
If you want to promote democracy, you can start by yanking the rug out under the Saudi royal family. And start leaning on Mubarak and Olmert. And pull the CIA out of Colombia (along with whatever other goons you have running around there).

Claims that any military intervention is supposed to promote democracy and human rights are going to ring hollow - extremely hollow - if there's still so much lower-hanging fruit around in the democracy promotion department. It'd look much like shooting a burglar and claiming that you did it because you're "concerned about your safety" - when you haven't even bothered to install a lock on your door in the first place. Not credible.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Jul 14th, 2008 at 08:47:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The notion that any large scale military intervention is to promote freedom and democracy for others is in itself delusional.  After all it wouldn't take much to depose that goon Mugabe, but no one is going to bother.  Nations go to war with other nations when their own perceived vital national interests are at stake.  The US is not going to put its own troops in harms way just to get rid of some tinpot dictator if there is nothing in it for them.  The problem for the US is that it has outsourced the definition of its "vital national interests" to a small coterie of corporate interests.

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Mon Jul 14th, 2008 at 08:59:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series