Display:
Lithuania set for clash with Brussels over nuclear power plant - EUobserver

Lithuania has stepped up pressure on the European Commission by deciding to hold a referendum on whether to extend the lifespan of the Ignalina nuclear power plant, despite having agreed - as a condition of entry into the EU - to shut the station down at the end of 2009.

On Monday (14 July), 88 out of 141 Lithuanian parliamentarians supported a call for a non-binding plebiscite on the issue, while five MPs were against and eleven abstained. The referendum is due on 12 October, the same day as the general parliamentary elections.

The signing of Lithuania's EU accession treaty, which lays out a timetable for closure of Ignalina

"Our motive is the difficult situation facing Lithuania," Vytautas Bogusis, who tabled the referendum idea, told AFP. He added that the situation after Ignalina is closed was likely to be "catastrophic" as electricity prices would "rise fourfold".

The chair of the parliament economic committee, Birute Vesaite, told Reuters that the country "should not remain silent and wait until the others take [its] electricity market share".

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 03:47:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Having known about the timetable for more than 4 years, and having more than 5 years lead time, what has the Lithuanian government done? Is another power plant in construction? If not, why?

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 03:06:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
but discussions have been blocked by various parties (mostly because of the need to do this as a multi-country project, which makes immesurably more difficult, and there's always been one of them blocking it for some reason).

So now time is running out. Because they put all their repalcement eggs in one basket!

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 11:06:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, if they really are trying to build a replacement then they might have a case for a extension of service of the old one until the new one is ready to take over. But if I were the Commission I'd put strong tabs on this to make sure the replacement is built.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 17th, 2008 at 05:06:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series