Display:
US to establish diplomatic presence in Iran | World news | guardian.co.uk

The US is planning to establish a diplomatic presence in Tehran for the first time in 30 years, a remarkable turnaround in policy by president George Bush who has pursued a hawkish approach to Iran throughout his time in office.

The Guardian has learned that an announcement will be made in the next month to establish a US interests section in Tehran, a halfway house to setting up a full embassy. The move will see US diplomats stationed in the country.

The news comes at a critical time in US-Iranian relations. After weeks that have seen tensions rise with Israel conducting war games aimed at Iran and Tehran carrying out long-range missile tests, a thaw appears to be under way.

The White House announced today that William Burns, a senior state department official, is to be sent to Switzerland on Saturday to hear Tehran's response to a European offer aimed at resolving the nuclear standoff.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 03:20:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Al Jazeera English - Americas - US diplomat to attend Iran talks
An envoy from the US will attend weekend talks with Iran and other major powers over Tehran's nuclear programme.

The announcement on Tuesday that William Burns, the US under-secretary of state, is to attend a meeting in Geneva with Saeed Jalili, Iranian nuclear negotiator, is a switch in position for the US.

Burns will join Javier Solana, the EU foreign policy chief, and envoys from China, Russia, France, Britain and Germany, at the meeting, due on Saturday.

They will discuss Iran's response to an offer made by world powers last month to give up nuclear work that the West believes is aimed at building an atomic bomb and Tehran says is for peaceful power-generation purposes

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 03:24:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
When I read stuff like this, I can't help thinking of Obama's change candidacy.  What many people do not see is this:  While Obama claims to represent change, the change has already come!  

"Where, pray tell?", someone might ask.  

Within the Bush Administration!

Out went Rumsfeld, Bolton, Rice of the "Birth Pangs" persuasion and Feith and in came Robert Gates and Rice of the "Negotiations instead of confrontation" persuasion.  Diplomacy has replaced confrontation (to some extent) within the Bush regime, plus it also embraces US troop reductions in Iraq.

Obama will just build on these already made changes.  In a sense, both he and McCain (whichever of the two wins) will give continuity to these changes that have already occurred.  The difference each candidate represents will be marginal in terms of substance, although their styles will be different.

"Beware of the man who does not talk, and the dog that does not bark." Cheyenne

by maracatu on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 04:25:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Maybe if Bush were in office for another decade or two, he would gradually figure out how to run a country...
by asdf on Thu Jul 17th, 2008 at 01:00:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Ha!  He might destroy the world in the process...

Bush's own changes show how bankrupt his [original] policies were from the beginning.

"Beware of the man who does not talk, and the dog that does not bark." Cheyenne

by maracatu on Thu Jul 17th, 2008 at 08:20:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series