Display:
EU climate proposals hurt industry, says Germany - EUobserver

The German Economy Ministry has attacked EU proposals to tackle climate change as "pointless" if other major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions are not also committed to significant reductions.

If climate polluters such as China, India and the United States are not also on board, the EU's climate package would end up harming German businesses.

Germany's criticisms go to the heart of the EU's climate and energy proposals

"Any success achieved in Europe would be pointless," says statement from the Economy Ministry issued on Tuesday (15 July).

The ministry laid out a raft of strong criticisms of the package, whose legislative proposals were unveiled by the European Commission in January, in a statement following a conference of German officials and business representatives.

Both the industry figures and deputy economy minister Jochen Homann at the meeting had offered reservations about some of the main planks of the climate package because they would hurt German competitiveness, according to a report from Reuters.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 03:16:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Any success achieved in Europe would be pointless

Doesn't sound to me like a criticism that "goes to the heart of" anything at all. It's just standard let's-go-on-doing-what-we-always-did stonewalling.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Jul 17th, 2008 at 03:02:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

EU proposals to tackle climate change as "pointless" if other major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions are not also committed to significant reductions.

That is largely true: what's the point of putting constraints on industry if they can just move out and do the same work while polluting more elsewhere (we've had 25 years of that already, offshoring our polluting activities to China et al)?

And it points to the solution: trade barriers against countries that do not apply the same standards in the relevant industries. Time to try a wedge in the "free trade" ideology that doesn't mind technical and financial rules to be standardised but somehow doesn't accept the same for labor or environmental ones.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu Jul 17th, 2008 at 09:28:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I entirely agree with and support your point against "environmental dumping" enabled by free trade orthodoxy, and the need for tariffs to counter it, but that isn't the thrust of the current German protest against emissions trading.

From the Reuters dispatch referenced by EUObserver:

EU climate package needs improvement, Germany says | Environment | Reuters

- Cutting the quota of emissions trading permits would push up the price of certificates and as a big fossil fuels burner Germany would be especially hard hit.

<...>

"Due to exploding oil and gas prices, further measures to achieve climate goals should be considered only with great caution," the ministry said.

"Rising energy prices are already a strong incentive to investment in renewable energies, energy savings and energy efficiency," it added.

They simply attack the emissions reduction scheme without calling for tariffs. Fran posts here an article from Manager Magazin reproduced in Spiegel that looks like another side of the same campaign. Emissions trading is so costly businesses will relocate, is the message:

The EU's Carbon Trading Scheme: Killing Jobs to Save the Climate - International - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News

carbon trading will have a direct impact on which countries firms chose to locate in.

Here there's just a threat to move to Ukraine if regulation is not eased. And, from the ministry above, a "let-the-market-handle-it" line. They're not campaigning for protective tariffs, they're fighting emissions trading schemes (unless toothless).

In other words, though you're right we need a global approach, I think I'm right too that this banging on the drum is just Germany calling for absence of constraints.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Jul 18th, 2008 at 02:41:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
31 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
15 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
8 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

Recent Diaries
Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
15 comments

Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
31 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
8 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Answers to the Renewable Energy Consultation
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 7

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Mismatch with the Natural Gas Market
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3
22 comments

The Future of Economics
by ARGeezer - Feb 2
191 comments

Desert Island Discs - Helen's distortions
by Helen - Jan 31
48 comments

Gorila
by DoDo - Jan 29
14 comments

Rail News Blogging #7
by DoDo - Jan 29
15 comments

Obama's State Of The Union: LQD
by Crazy Horse - Jan 25
74 comments

Democracy Technology
by gmoke - Jan 24
1 comment

The Hydrogen dream
by Luis de Sousa - Jan 24
49 comments

ET Paris Meet-Up 2012 (2 UPDATE)
by afew - Jan 23
113 comments

More Diaries...
Occasional Series