The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Redundancy costs? Any time the marginal gas plants already there don't run, they are avoiding the likely staggering fuel costs of the future. That's a value, bolstered by their ability to be turned on when needed.
My point here is that (say) the costs of running a gas fired power station are 50% fixed, 50% variable (i.e. proportionate to the about of electricity produced - due mainly to the cost of the input fuel).
The Unit cost of electricity from such a plant operating at 10% capacity (i.e. only at times of extreme peak demand/low average wind speeds) is (50+50/10)/10 = 5.5 per 1% unit capacity
If that same plant is operating at 50% capacity the equivalent unit costs is (50+50/2)/50 = 1.5 per 1% unit capacity - in other words almost 4 times cheaper. Thus there is a marginal cost to maintaining more redundancy because of greater intermittency in the system.
"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by DoDo - Sep 30 3 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 29 20 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 29 19 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 27 4 comments
by afew - Sep 22 10 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24 130 comments
by Migeru - Sep 21 33 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 19 27 comments
by DoDo - Sep 303 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 2920 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2919 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 274 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24130 comments
by afew - Sep 2210 comments
by Migeru - Sep 2133 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1927 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Sep 18
by A swedish kind of death - Sep 1529 comments
by ChrisCook - Sep 1455 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11129 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 969 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 610 comments
by Migeru - Sep 438 comments