The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Redundancy costs? Any time the marginal gas plants already there don't run, they are avoiding the likely staggering fuel costs of the future. That's a value, bolstered by their ability to be turned on when needed.
My point here is that (say) the costs of running a gas fired power station are 50% fixed, 50% variable (i.e. proportionate to the about of electricity produced - due mainly to the cost of the input fuel).
The Unit cost of electricity from such a plant operating at 10% capacity (i.e. only at times of extreme peak demand/low average wind speeds) is (50+50/10)/10 = 5.5 per 1% unit capacity
If that same plant is operating at 50% capacity the equivalent unit costs is (50+50/2)/50 = 1.5 per 1% unit capacity - in other words almost 4 times cheaper. Thus there is a marginal cost to maintaining more redundancy because of greater intermittency in the system.
"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by DoDo - Dec 21 6 comments
by das monde - Dec 14 38 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 16 8 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 15 130 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 20 12 comments
by gmoke - Dec 2 16 comments
by LEP - Dec 9 52 comments
by gmoke - Dec 17
by DoDo - Dec 213 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 206 comments
by gmoke - Dec 17
by ReGiNuss - Dec 172 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 164 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 1565 comments
by das monde - Dec 1419 comments
by LEP - Dec 926 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 816 comments
by gmoke - Dec 72 comments
by rz - Dec 415 comments
by gmoke - Dec 28 comments
by A swedish kind of death - Dec 233 comments
by rz - Nov 3071 comments
by Migeru - Nov 2959 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 242 comments
by Cyrille - Nov 247 comments
by gmoke - Nov 1916 comments