The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Redundancy costs? Any time the marginal gas plants already there don't run, they are avoiding the likely staggering fuel costs of the future. That's a value, bolstered by their ability to be turned on when needed.
My point here is that (say) the costs of running a gas fired power station are 50% fixed, 50% variable (i.e. proportionate to the about of electricity produced - due mainly to the cost of the input fuel).
The Unit cost of electricity from such a plant operating at 10% capacity (i.e. only at times of extreme peak demand/low average wind speeds) is (50+50/10)/10 = 5.5 per 1% unit capacity
If that same plant is operating at 50% capacity the equivalent unit costs is (50+50/2)/50 = 1.5 per 1% unit capacity - in other words almost 4 times cheaper. Thus there is a marginal cost to maintaining more redundancy because of greater intermittency in the system.
"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by aquilon - Mar 10 35 comments
by epochepoque - Mar 7 11 comments
by Cyrille - Mar 8 1 comment
by afew - Mar 7 36 comments
by DoDo - Mar 10 16 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 10 6 comments
by marco - Mar 3 43 comments
by maracatu - Feb 25 13 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Mar 12
by gmoke - Mar 10
by ARGeezer - Mar 106 comments
by aquilon - Mar 1035 comments
by DoDo - Mar 1016 comments
by Cyrille - Mar 81 comment
by epochepoque - Mar 711 comments
by afew - Mar 736 comments
by Oui - Mar 562 comments
by Oui - Mar 413 comments
by marco - Mar 343 comments
by vbo - Mar 124 comments
by Oui - Mar 11 comment
by Oui - Mar 13 comments
by Metatone - Feb 287 comments
by vbo - Feb 27110 comments
by gmoke - Feb 263 comments
by vbo - Feb 25102 comments
by maracatu - Feb 2513 comments
by Oui - Feb 2440 comments