The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Redundancy costs? Any time the marginal gas plants already there don't run, they are avoiding the likely staggering fuel costs of the future. That's a value, bolstered by their ability to be turned on when needed.
My point here is that (say) the costs of running a gas fired power station are 50% fixed, 50% variable (i.e. proportionate to the about of electricity produced - due mainly to the cost of the input fuel).
The Unit cost of electricity from such a plant operating at 10% capacity (i.e. only at times of extreme peak demand/low average wind speeds) is (50+50/10)/10 = 5.5 per 1% unit capacity
If that same plant is operating at 50% capacity the equivalent unit costs is (50+50/2)/50 = 1.5 per 1% unit capacity - in other words almost 4 times cheaper. Thus there is a marginal cost to maintaining more redundancy because of greater intermittency in the system.
"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by A swedish kind of death - Sep 15 2 comments
by ChrisCook - Sep 14 45 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11 129 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 9 64 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 6 10 comments
by Migeru - Sep 4 38 comments
by Metatone - Aug 30 5 comments
by gmoke - Aug 26
by A swedish kind of death - Sep 152 comments
by ChrisCook - Sep 1445 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11129 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 964 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 610 comments
by Migeru - Sep 438 comments
by Metatone - Aug 305 comments
by Xavier in Paris - Aug 293 comments
by gmoke - Aug 26
by Metatone - Aug 227 comments
by eurogreen - Aug 2133 comments
by afew - Aug 1965 comments