The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Redundancy costs? Any time the marginal gas plants already there don't run, they are avoiding the likely staggering fuel costs of the future. That's a value, bolstered by their ability to be turned on when needed.
My point here is that (say) the costs of running a gas fired power station are 50% fixed, 50% variable (i.e. proportionate to the about of electricity produced - due mainly to the cost of the input fuel).
The Unit cost of electricity from such a plant operating at 10% capacity (i.e. only at times of extreme peak demand/low average wind speeds) is (50+50/10)/10 = 5.5 per 1% unit capacity
If that same plant is operating at 50% capacity the equivalent unit costs is (50+50/2)/50 = 1.5 per 1% unit capacity - in other words almost 4 times cheaper. Thus there is a marginal cost to maintaining more redundancy because of greater intermittency in the system.
"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Bernard - Apr 24 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 5 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 25 comments
by Bernard - Apr 6 5 comments
by fjallstrom - Apr 2 57 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 275 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2725 comments
by Bernard - Apr 2423 comments
by gmoke - Apr 11
by Bernard - Apr 65 comments
by marco - Apr 430 comments
by fjallstrom - Apr 257 comments