The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The fact is that the oil companies have (exception: ExxonMobil) rebranded themselves as "energy" companies, and are using their tremendous and growing cash to buy their way into the alternative energy businesses. The rich will continue to get richer, as before.
The interesting test will be to see whether the regions controlled by "leftists" in the U.S., namely the coasts, will be as flexible in allowing alternative energy sources. So far, places like Texas and Colorado have shown more willingness to adopt real industrial-scale alternatives than the Northeast...
Pickens aside, who I assume is a patriot along the lines of H Ross Perot (who I voted for), I thought that all of the talk by the oil companies about alternative energy sources was just that, a boat-load of talk.
I don't feel sorry for Joe Blow American. This whole energy mess was obvious back in the early '70s but it took 4 1/2 buck gas PLUS global warming PLUS the loss of the polar caps to get people to start cutting back on wasting hydrocarbons. Let the rich get richer if that's what it takes to get the job done. Ah, the headlines. "Paris Hilton saves planet Earth!". Who'd a thought.
My allegiance to the human species ends at the California border.
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 16 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 8 44 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 9 16 comments
by Helen - Aug 2 15 comments
by Oui - Aug 6 22 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 17 147 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 29 93 comments
by Cat - Aug 2 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 166 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 916 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 844 comments
by Oui - Aug 622 comments
by Cat - Aug 214 comments
by Helen - Aug 215 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 2993 comments
by Oui - Jul 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 17147 comments