The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The fact is that the oil companies have (exception: ExxonMobil) rebranded themselves as "energy" companies, and are using their tremendous and growing cash to buy their way into the alternative energy businesses. The rich will continue to get richer, as before.
The interesting test will be to see whether the regions controlled by "leftists" in the U.S., namely the coasts, will be as flexible in allowing alternative energy sources. So far, places like Texas and Colorado have shown more willingness to adopt real industrial-scale alternatives than the Northeast...
Pickens aside, who I assume is a patriot along the lines of H Ross Perot (who I voted for), I thought that all of the talk by the oil companies about alternative energy sources was just that, a boat-load of talk.
I don't feel sorry for Joe Blow American. This whole energy mess was obvious back in the early '70s but it took 4 1/2 buck gas PLUS global warming PLUS the loss of the polar caps to get people to start cutting back on wasting hydrocarbons. Let the rich get richer if that's what it takes to get the job done. Ah, the headlines. "Paris Hilton saves planet Earth!". Who'd a thought.
My allegiance to the human species ends at the California border.
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 16 22 comments
by Cat - Oct 21
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 17 75 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 12 30 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 36 comments
by fjallstrom - Sep 29 41 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 30 21 comments
by Cat - Oct 21
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1775 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1622 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1230 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 236 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 3021 comments
by fjallstrom - Sep 2941 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 262 comments
by Cat - Sep 1423 comments