European Tribune

Display:
Military strike not an option on Iran, EU ministers say - EUobserver

European Union foreign ministers on Tuesday (22 July) called for further diplomacy in dealing with concerns over Iran's nuclear programme and ruled out a military strike as an option.

UK foreign secretary David Miliband said following the meeting: "We are 100 percent focussed on a diplomatic resolution to the Iranian issue."

Uranium enrichment: Iran insists it is for peaceful purposes

The EU's foreign policy chief, Javier Solana, said there was "no other route" apart from diplomacy.

"The position of the European Union is clear," said Mr Solana according to the AP. "We want to find a diplomatic solution to this, in particular to clarify to the fullest the nature of their nuclear programme."

Mr Solana outlined for the ministers the results of a meeting on Saturday between Iran and diplomats from the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, China, and Russia, where Tehran was encouraged to halt its uranium enrichment in return for a package of economic and political carrots.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 23rd, 2008 at 03:07:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Didn't the UK labour poodleship say similar things about seeking peaceful resolutions to Iraq ? Before we bombed the f... out of it.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 23rd, 2008 at 05:35:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"... and ruled out a military strike as an option."

What is this supposed to mean?  That mighty Belgium will not attack Iran?  What about the neofacists and their government fronts, the US and Israel?  Is this article also speaking for them?

Think what another conflict would do for the war profiteers?  Cheney must be drooling!

When the music's over, turn out the light. Jim Morrison, the doors

by THE Twank (paszeski__aaaaaaatttttt__yahoo.com) on Wed Jul 23rd, 2008 at 05:38:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The article is about the European Union. Seems clear enough.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Jul 24th, 2008 at 03:16:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This means no NATO backing for the operation.

For some reason the US government can still fool the US public by showing token political support from the UN or NATO, or even the UK, Australia and El Salvador (and let's not forget Poland).

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 24th, 2008 at 03:38:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
no "international community backing" for the attacks, in the vision accepted in the international press (in English) which essentially conflates "international community" with "a few recognizable European countries")

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Thu Jul 24th, 2008 at 06:00:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Reading ET and asking questions ... always an education.

When the music's over, turn out the light. Jim Morrison, the doors
by THE Twank (paszeski__aaaaaaatttttt__yahoo.com) on Thu Jul 24th, 2008 at 06:35:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Very good.  Thank you.

When the music's over, turn out the light. Jim Morrison, the doors
by THE Twank (paszeski__aaaaaaatttttt__yahoo.com) on Thu Jul 24th, 2008 at 06:33:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Recent Diaries
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series