Display:
There's very little (if any) contingency in the budget for those on a very low income, which makes it almost impossible to cover the rising costs without seriously cutting back on quality/quantity of food.

Public employers are resisting allowing pay rises (which would help some to meet these additional costs) because of the impact this could have on inflation and the argument that increasing pay will mean job cuts.

I imagine that similar arguments are being used in the private sector too, but the threat of redundancy and lack of unionisation and collective bargaining agreements makes this possibility even more acute for workers. Yet the unfairness of it is that the ones at the top will still keep receiving their bonuses and disproportionately large pay packets.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Sat Jul 5th, 2008 at 05:16:45 AM EST
and its those at the top, with large cars that are being disproportionately subsidised by everyone else.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Sat Jul 5th, 2008 at 05:46:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series