Display:
I live on the 10th floor of an 11-story building and don't think it's that bad, but it does get less and less practical with every additional floor.  (Especially when, as happened two days ago, the elevators broke and I had to walk up 10 flights of un-airconditioned stairs on a 39°C day.  That's 102°F.)

That said, there's already a severe street-parking shortage near my office, and they're currently building two more highrises across the street; it looks like at least one of the buildings, if not both, are ignoring the city's requirement to build parking in any new construction, so we're bracing for a nightmare if and when those buildings are actually occupied.  (Which, the way things go here, could be years after they're actually built.)

Washington D.C. also has a height restriction, as do some of the surrounding communities; this blogger based in the Maryland suburbs has some interesting suggestions for regulating the construction of taller buildings so as to make them greener and more workable.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Jul 9th, 2008 at 06:18:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The problem with street parking can be solved with adequate public transportation, which is more or less the case in Paris (the extreme office concentration of La Défense causes problems).

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Wed Jul 9th, 2008 at 06:29:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That said, there's already a severe street-parking shortage near my office, and they're currently building two more highrises across the street; it looks like at least one of the buildings, if not both, are ignoring the city's requirement to build parking in any new construction, so we're bracing for a nightmare if and when those buildings are actually occupied.

NYC has strict parking space laws that work in the opposite direction in Manhattan - i.e. you are not allowed to build much of it. That's a good thing - the core of the Midtown office district has about 700,000 jobs packed into one square kilometer, I'm not quite sure how one would handle that with car based commuting.

by MarekNYC on Wed Jul 9th, 2008 at 11:14:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, Paris had a policy to force new residential buildings to have underground parking spaces, but they've now reversed this and actually forbid new buildings to include underground parkings. This forces residents to either have no car, or to park them on the street (where residential parking has been made extremely cheap and convenient, ie it costs you 50c a day, or 2.50 euros for a full week, on any legitimate parking space).

Lack of parking space has been shown to be the single most important factor driving traffic in Paris, so the city is busy reducing the overall stock inside Paris.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 9th, 2008 at 05:38:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I believe the Manhattan rule on residential buildings is a maximum of one parking spot for every five apartments. Commercial parking is disappearing as it gets converted into apartment and office buildings. Even around me non-street parking can be rather expensive - recently saw  one space being advertised for an even $100K plus property taxes - note, this is just a parking space, admittedly it was in Park Slope which is about as expensive as it gets in Brooklyn, but is also purely residential. When I moved to my neighbourhood many of the old carriage houses were being used as garages, now they're rapidly being turned into condos. (The original neighbourhood plan had alternate streets of large homes with carriage houses facing out the back).
by MarekNYC on Wed Jul 9th, 2008 at 06:26:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series