European Tribune

Display:
Guardian:
Shadows in the sunshine
It is a tourist favourite and looks EU bound, but Croatia's attitude to its fascist past is troubling

Croatia is a "small country for a big vacation", as the ads tell you. But beyond the marketing and optimistic reports of millions of holidaymakers spending their "big vacation" there, there is less cheerful news, casting an unpleasant shadow over that small tourist paradise on the Adriatic.

This summer Dinko Sakic, the 86-year-old former commander of Jasenovac, the notorious second world war concentration camp, was buried in his Ustashe uniform, the Croatian equivalent of the Nazis. After the war, Sakic emigrated to Argentina but returned after Croatian independence in 1991. He was welcomed back like a celebrity. In his interviews, Sakic repeated that he regretted nothing. What Sakic should have repented was that tens of thousands of inmates in Jasenovac were murdered under his command. He also personally executed two Jewish prisoners. Franjo Tudjman's government showed no will to put Sakic on trial until Israel signalled it was perfectly willing to try him there. So in 1998, Sakic was sentenced to a maximum of 20 years. At his funeral a Dominican priest, Vjekoslav Lasic gave a speech in which he advised Croats to admire Sakic and to take him as an example.

by lychee (lychee9393 A yahoo D com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 04:44:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Almost as worrying as Italy's attitude to their facist present.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 04:49:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
the velvet version is user-friendly....a prophylactic!

besides, they look great in their uniforms, like clark gable...

pre-fascism, with your fettucini

The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it. Chinese Proverb.

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 04:44:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Ho hum.

Maybe The West™ will wake up to the unsavoury side of Croatia's nationalism 10 to 15 years after they should have...

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 05:00:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well..."we told you so". That's why Serbs in Croatia did not want to stand under their Nazi flag.
Because they also remember Jasenovac...just from the other side of wire (those who were not murdered).
Croats never denied that they are proud of their Nazi past...never ever...especially not trough this war of 90ies.But you did not want to hear them. Western fairytale of good guys vs. bad guys would be spoiled.
by vbo on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 05:45:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Please tell us about the Chetnik, too...

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 05:53:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well to make long story short Chetnics originally were Serbian fighters (guerrilla) AGAINST Germans. And against communists (most of the time) all though they cooperated from time to time against Germans. Looks like they cooperated from time to time with enemy against communists too (not sure about this). Murky times...They were royalists.
After the war against Germans (and civil war at the same time) Tito had to make balance between nations in order to make "brotherhood and unity" alive. That's why our history books equalized Ustashe (Croats Nazi force) and Chetnics both as same evil. But they were nothing like same at all. Sorry I am not in a mood to write long posts at the moment so I'll copy/paste few things from Internet that I found relevant:

The Royal Serbian army, better known as "the chetnics", under the command of general Draza Mihailovic, saved a total number of 513 American pilots during WW2.
...General Draza was awarded the Legion of Merit for his heroic deeds.
...Legion of Merit is the highest USA decoration meant for foreign citizens for exceptional merits. Draza Mihailovic was decorated at the proposal of USA General Dwight Eisenhower.
...Hollywood even made a movie during WW2 about the Serbian chetnics, which are today portrayed as some sort of animals that bite off people's ears and stuff...
...He did indeed earn the Legion of Merit after the war, and it was indeed kept secret -- to avoid offending Tito's Yugoslavia.

Mind you most of these pilots were saved even after the Allies had made the decision to abandon supporting General Draza Mihailovic's Chetniks and switch to supporting Tito's Communist Partizans in late 1943, after the Chetniks had paved the way for a German defeat in Yugoslavia.
...in Serbia and Eastern Bosnia the Serbs fought against the Germans to the end.
...Tito, the half Croat/half Slovene, took enjoyment turning his Partizan army made up of at least 80% Serbs on fellow Serbian Chetniks. He didn't give a rat's arse about the Serbian population and this was proved by the fact that Croatian Ustashe run death camps especially in Jasenovac and Stara Gradiska were liberated by the Russian Red Army despite the fact that the Partizans were in a position to do so as the Ustashe at the end of 1944 were well and truly defeated and most of their troops fled towards Austria.

It's interesting that even Stalin supported Mihailovich up until 1943, and he switched to Tito later, in 1944. But Tito and the communist owe their power in Yugoslavia mainly to the support of Churchill and the British.
...Even though the Chetnics did cooperate with the Germans and the Italians from time to time (if there wasn't for the Italians and the partisans, Serbian population in Croatia would've been completely annihilated by the Croats), but that cooperation mainly came to agreements of non-attacking, or attacking the communists.
...After Tito completely took over, and after the war ended, the communists killed in cold blood thousands and thousands of "disloyal" Serbs who weren't communists.

Considering other nations living in Yugoslavia, almost all of them collaborated with the NAZI's. The Croats even created a Nazi satellite state NDH (the Independent state of Croatia) and conducted one of the worst ever genocide against the Serbian population, almost 1 million Serbs, according to some estimations.
...The Croats and the Muslims in Bosnia, later greatly supported by western countries during the latest wars, were members of the largest SS division Hitler ever had. It was called 13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Handschar (1st Croatian).
Quote:
The 13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Handschar (1st Croatian) was one of the thirty-eight divisions fielded as part of the Waffen-SS during World War II. It was the largest of the SS divisions, with 21,065 men at its peak[citation needed], composed almost entirely of non-German Muslim and Catholic recruits drawn from Bosnia. Handschar (Bosnian/Croatian: Handžar) was the local word for the Turkish scimitar (Arabic: Khanjar خنجر), a historical symbol of Bosnia and Islam. An image of the Handschar adorned the division's flag and coat of arms.

After the war, he (Mihajlovic) was tried and convicted of high treason by Yugoslav authorities, and was consequently executed by firing squad.
...However, Mihailović decided against active resistance, allegedly because of Serb losses in World War I, in which the Kingdom of Serbia lost a quarter of its male population to the war.[2] Instead, Mihailović gathered men and weapons in the easily defensible Serbian mountains, waiting for an Allied landing in the Balkans, upon which he could attack any Germans or Italians from behind. Mihailović discouraged sabotage due to German reprisals (such as more than 3,000 killed in Kraljevo and Kragujevac) unless some great gain could be accomplished; instead, he favored delayed sabotage that could not easily be traced.

And so on...

by vbo on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 09:36:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
vbo, maybe you should post this and some of your other comments as a diary! Would keep the information more neatly to gether and maybe make discussing it easier. :-)

And great to see you here on ET more often again!

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 09:41:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You are right! I hijacked the thread. Sorry!
by vbo on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 09:54:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No need to apologize - I just think your links and stuff would be diary worthy!!! :-)
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 10:10:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
When she makes it a diary she should spend some time addressing
Throughout the War, the Chetnik movement remained relatively inactive against the occupation forces, and increasingly collaborated with the Axis, losing its international recognition as the Yugoslav resistance force. After a brief initial period of cooperation, the two factions quickly started fighting against each-other. Gradually, the Chetniks ended up primarily fighting the Partisans instead of the occupation forces, and started cooperating with the Axis in their struggle to destroy the resistance, receiving increasing amounts of logistical assistance (in particular, from Italy).
The same Wikipedia article includes allegations of ethnic cleansing as well as
During the Yugoslav wars, Serb paramilitaries often self-identified as Chetniks. Vojislav Šešelj's Serbian Radical Party formed the White Eagles which was identified as Chetniks. Vuk Drašković's Serbian Renewal Movement was closely associated with the Serbian Guard, which was also associated with Chetniks and monarchism.
and
In late 2004, the National Assembly of Serbia passed a new law that equalized the rights of the former Chetnik members with those of the former Partisans, including the right to war pensions. Rights were granted on the basis that both were anti-fascist movements that fought occupiers, and this formulation has entered the law. The vote was 176 for, 24 against and 4 abstained. The Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS) of Slobodan Milošević was the one voting against the decision.
and
Today Chetnik activity is seriously restricted or banned in all neighbouring countries other than Serbia and Republika Srpska in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Milorad Pupovac of the Independent Democratic Serbian Party in Croatia, has called the organization "fascist collaborators". In 2003, the Montenegrin government forbade the building of a statue of Pavle Đurišić near Berane.
For what it's worth...

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 10:53:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
boy, are you a source for motivation! :-)
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 11:04:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, you were ready to take vbo's word that the Ustashe were fascist but not the Chetnik, who were patriots. They were both patriots, and fascist.

We have had discussions of similar Polish and Baltic factions in the past...

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 11:13:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, but I guess it would be more motivating to let her write her diary first and then discuss the counterarguments there. :-)
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 11:37:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
They were both patriots, and fascist.

Well I don't think so. As I said looks like they did cooperate at some points with Germans and Italians against communists but they were far from fascists. Ideologically they were NO fascists.
As opposed to Ustashe that were WORSE then German fascists.Ideologically and in practice...
Would Americans give Legion of Merit to a fascist?
Looking at the present time...Well one never knows haha.
What your Croat friends have to say about Ustashe ?...I am curious...

by vbo on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 11:45:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Would Americans give Legion of Merit to a fascist?
Looking at the present time...Well one never knows haha.

Hey, it's well-documented that the Americans enlisted former Nazis to fight the Communists after WWII, so...

I never debated WWII with my Croatian friends, but I can tell you a large part of them had no patience for Tudjman.

Interestingly it tended to be either older people, or the girls my age. The boys my age (they were between 15 and 20 in the early 90's) were all gung-ho nationalists. Must be a side effect of the high testosterone levels.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 11:53:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Not quite sure how the Ustashe were worse than the Nazis. Unlike Migeru I wouldn't characterize the Chetniks as straight out fascist, more Franco style nationalist-conservative-authoritarian with fascist elements. But then some do see Franco as straight fascist.

Also you really shouldn't make the mistake of saying that because they fought against one set of fascists that somehow makes them non-fascist. The Polish fascist resistance group NSZ, for example, consistently fought the Nazis during the occupation, but they were very much fascists - more so actually than the Chetniks, and just as much as the Ustashe.

by MarekNYC on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 11:54:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Unlike Migeru I wouldn't characterize the Chetniks as straight out fascist, more Franco style nationalist-conservative-authoritarian with fascist elements. But then some do see Franco as straight fascist.

We have had this debate before, and I have conceded your point that Franco was a soft fascist.

But I'll still call him a fascist anyway even if it's not 100% accurate in political science terms.

Franco may not have been a fascist, but the CEDADE and the Falange were straight-out pascists, and he folded them into his National Movement.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 12:00:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Nationalist-conservative, yes, Chetnics were but I don't see them necessarily as fascists. I don't see them as racists for example...but then again who knows what would be the case if they managed to get in power. Ustashe managed (with a help of Hitler) to get in power and it was real practical fascism, racism...you name it. No other word for it and especially not patriots all tho they were patriotic in a way that they would do anything ( and I mean anything even go along with Hitler) for Croatia.
by vbo on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 12:21:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Racism was very central to German fascism, same goes for the French and the various East Central European ones. But that wasn't the case for the Italians and the Spaniards.  
by MarekNYC on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 12:47:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Not quite sure how the Ustashe were worse than the Nazis.

I meant for Serbs in WWII. Germans did terrible crimes (especially in revenge for killed German solders) but Ustashe wiped whole villages, whole families down to the baby in a cot in most horrific "manners". Plane evil...and Jasenovac will be for ever engraved in Serbian collective mind...never to be forgotten. Again it's a game with numbers but the numbers are huge one way or another...Have you seen movie "Occupation in 26 pictures"...Croatian director...made before these war.Try to find it and you may get a glimse of the picture about Ustashe
Well we can talk about it some other time. It'v well passed bad time here in Oz.
by vbo on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 12:38:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
During the Yugoslav wars, Serb paramilitaries often self-identified as Chetniks. Vojislav Šešelj's Serbian Radical Party formed the White Eagles which was identified as Chetniks. Vuk Drašković's Serbian Renewal Movement was closely associated with the Serbian Guard, which was also associated with Chetniks and monarchism.

Those who presented (or still present) their selves as Chetnics nowadays have absolutely nothing to do with real Chetnics organization that is actually non-existent nowadays. Some oldies may still live somewhere in exile but they are really old and totally out of touch with what is really happening on the Balkan. Sheshelj used them to get hold of their money representing him self as Chetnic (and he can't be farther then that).Similar thing is with Drashkovic. Those oldies finally realized those false Chetnics are only interested in their money and they do not want to have anything with those thieves.

In late 2004, the National Assembly of Serbia passed a new law that equalized the rights of the former Chetnik members with those of the former Partisans, including the right to war pensions. Rights were granted on the basis that both were anti-fascist movements that fought occupiers, and this formulation has entered the law. The vote was 176 for, 24 against and 4 abstained. The Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS) of Slobodan Milošević was the one voting against the decision.

This was done to finally finish "civil war" in Serbia between partisans and Chetnics. I believe it's right thing.Milosevics SPS are "partisans" that enjoyed all privilegies for decades.And they killed probably more Serbs (during and after WWII) then Germans did.Time to reconsile...
by vbo on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 12:02:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But Tito and the communist owe their power in Yugoslavia mainly to the support of Churchill and the British.

One of the conspiracy theories in Serbia during Tito's times was that Tito actually was British "agent". He never spoke language properly and had totally strange accent...nothing like Croat ...or even Russian...or Slav...
Why for the sake of God would Churchill give up on a royalist (our king and his family had asylum in GB at the time) and go support the communist???  Why Yugoslavia was allowed to say NO to Russia in 1948 and have it's own way ...Must be some fucking experiment agreed between British and Russian leaders...
by vbo on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 09:51:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm so tired of Tito conspiracy theories.

When talking to Croatian friends in the 90's they would accuse Yugoslavia of being a Serb supremacist device to destroy Croatians as an independent people, and when I said "but Tito was a Croat" they said "but he was a Communist".

It's all about bogeymen, and when the ethnicity of the bogeyman is not the right one you can always blame the Communists. (Like Stalin the Georgian and Brezhnev the Ukrainian)

Bah, humbug.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 10:59:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Croats never denied that they are proud of their Nazi past...never ever...especially not trough this war of 90ies.But you did not want to hear them. Western fairytale of good guys vs. bad guys would be spoiled.

Who is you? Not me, that's for sure.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 11:40:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I am sorry...when I say you I usually think West Europeans...nothing personal...
by vbo on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 12:25:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And we keep asking you whether you read European Tribune every time you call us us "you".

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 12:26:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There's a lot of truth in that for the early phases of the war. But later on there was plenty of very critical press on the Croats, both their war crimes and their soft spot for the Ustashe.
by MarekNYC on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 11:49:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Not to mention the controversy over the beatification of cardinal Stepinac by Pope Wojtyla...

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Aug 29th, 2008 at 11:55:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Dancing in the Streets
by rdf - Dec 5
2 comments

Electric Cars for Everyone - Tomorrow
by gmoke - Dec 4
6 comments

On Rhetoric
by rg - Dec 3
88 comments

Me and my son, a Shministim
by shergald - Dec 4
3 comments

Bugger Thy Neighbour
by redstar - Dec 3
272 comments

So, Ideology is Dead. So now what ?
by ValentinD - Nov 26
650 comments

Not quite the 'perfect fix'?
by djhabakkuk - Dec 3
4 comments

Georgia on my mind...[Updated]
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3
22 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series