Display:
Wind Energy: Tiny Turbines May Have a Bright Future - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International

They are small and look more like art than innovation. But the mini-windmills built by a British company could soon be on roofs across Europe and the US -- if German energy giant RWE has its way.

 A small wind turbine like this one may be coming soon to a roof near you. They look a bit like attachments for a gigantic hand-held mixer. But at five meters (16 feet) tall and with a diameter of close to three meters, they are certainly too big for a kitchen cabinet. They would, however, definitely fit in backyards and city parks and on the roofs of houses and office buildings.

And if the German power company RWE has its way, there will soon be thousands of the funny-looking rotors installed in the coming months and years -- in Germany, in Europe and even in the US.

It is not, as one might be tempted to believe, a vast, futuristic art project. Rather, the odd-looking, twisting contraptions are the newest generation of high-tech wind turbines. In contrast to their cousins, these windmills are virtually silent, do not require long blades to catch the wind, and spin no matter which direction the wind is blowing. Even better, their modest size and weight mean they can easily be installed on rooftops -- and they can generate up to 10,000 kilowatt hours of electricity a year, enough to supply two low-energy homes, or a 20 person office, with power.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 2nd, 2008 at 02:56:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

do not require long blades to catch the wind

Luckily, RWE scientists have discovered a method of turning the energy in 1 sq meter of wind into the equivalent energy from 100 sq. meters.  We're saved!

You know, i don't even need blades to catch the wind, much less long ones... i just cup my hands together.
</snark>

"Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin

by Crazy Horse on Wed Sep 3rd, 2008 at 04:19:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Of course they don't capture nearly as much wind. But the big question is how much energy for how much money, not how much energy for how much blade span.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Wed Sep 3rd, 2008 at 05:24:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As i've said here often, i've nothing against small urban turbines.  But the long-term cost of energy is very high, partly because urban winds range from mild to non-existent, with much greater turbulence. The message needs to be commercial, utility-scale turbines; that's the immediate solution.

When the populace stops fighting commercial machines, as in the insane opposition in the UK, accepting their presence on the landscape where there are truly harvestable winds, these can be an acceptable toys.  I'd rather see subsidized solar in urban areas.

"Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin

by Crazy Horse on Wed Sep 3rd, 2008 at 06:01:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
How about tall turbines in the centre of large roundabouts?

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 3rd, 2008 at 06:11:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

urban winds range from mild to non-existent, with much greater turbulence.


In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Sep 3rd, 2008 at 08:54:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series