European Tribune

Display:
I received this by email a few days ago, got authorisation to post it, but got distracted by other things:


Russia is not easy to deal with but the Bush administration has not dealt with Russia at all sensibly.

It is perfectly obvious that Russia has launched a preemptive strike against Georgian membership of NATO, which America was promoting. America's bluff has been called. I think the problem is so often that American officials are overly academic. They have concepts and projects they want to implement, like spreading "democracy and the rule of law". But their mindset cannot fully engage with what is happening on the ground, or accept that the Russian point of view is not the same as theirs, but still has to be taken seriously because Russia is Georgia's neighbour. Because people believed Georgia ought to become an American military bastion, they forgot that Georgia as an American bastion is not a terribly practical idea, given the power and the thinking of the current regime in Moscow. As George Kennan said, Americans in foreign policy can sometimes be "moralistic in the demands placed on others, and self-righteous in the degree of rectitude they impute to themselves". After all, what made Georgia interesting to the United States as a place to implant "American values" was its importance as an energy transit country! The American policy that might have served Georgia better would have been to find a way to ensure that liberalising Georgia could be achieved without antagonising Russia. Instead, the Americans made Georgia more of a thorn in Russia's side through the prospect of NATO membership when they did not have any real will to protect Georgia in the event of a Russian attack. The western media often fails to appreciate that Russia is genuinely frightened by NATO expansion so close to its own borders, particularly if this involves the stationing of nuclear weapons.

In the end, the only way this problem is going to be solved is by bilateral negotiations between Moscow and Washington. If you are not prepared to go to war, and the USA is not, then you have to negotiate. And there is no point in threatening Russia with a loss of respect around the world because the EU, China and the United States are going to continue to do business with Russia whatever happens to Georgia. My worry is that Washington does not really know how to do this kind of diplomacy. There has been a combination of reproaches, inaction and empty threats, when what is required from Washington is some tough negotiating that will safeguard the independence of the former Soviet satellites and at the same time, normalise Russia's relations with them.



In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Wed Sep 3rd, 2008 at 04:18:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
As an addendum. I had received permission to post, but was not sure about giving the name. But I got authorisation for that too, so here it is: this was sent to me by Joseph Altman, who further sends me this:


Thank you for posting my comment. Actually in The Times the former British Ambassador to Washington (of all people) has also said that the NATO membership for the former Soviet Union countries was not a sensible idea. I used to think of him as the American Ambassador to Great Britain because he was always back in London for TV appearances trying to win support for the invasion of Iraq. His remarks about the European Union are very silly. These people remind me slightly of minor characters in "The Remains of the Day". Still it might interest you.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article4656255.ece

I really respect what your President is trying to do. I hope the Americans will give him their support. I am actually pro-American in the end (not very pro-Bush though) but I also love "the old Europe"!

I'm not sure I'd fully agree with the last comment on Sarkozy, given that most of what he does is for show rather than substantial, but it's true that he has been a moderating rather than a worsening force on that particular crisis, in his eagerness to get "peace" headlines.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Thu Sep 4th, 2008 at 09:01:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
These people remind me slightly of minor characters in "The Remains of the Day".

Ouch!

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Sep 4th, 2008 at 09:10:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
'scuse me Jerome, but could remind us of who Joseph Altman is?

Europeans think a hundred miles is a long way. Americans think a hundred years is a long time.
by Bernard on Thu Sep 4th, 2008 at 03:53:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I have no other credentials known to me...

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Fri Sep 5th, 2008 at 03:53:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series