Display:
Barack Obama would consider criminal charges against Bush administration over Guantanamo Bay - Telegraph
Joe Biden, Barack Obama's vice-presidential running mate, has indicated that a new Democratic administration could pursue criminal charges against the Bush administration over the treatment of detainees in Guantanamo bay.

Mr Biden said at an event in Deerfield Beach, Florida: "If there has been a basis upon which you can pursue someone for a criminal violation, they will be pursued, not out of vengeance, not out of retribution, out of the need to preserve the notion that no one, no attorney general, no president - no one is above the law."

His statement is the strongest indication yet that an Obama administartion might seek legal redress against the President George W. Bush. It could undermine Mr Obama's message of bipartisanship and moving beyond the battles over Iraq.

In April, Mr Obama struck a similar note when he promised that he would ask his attorney general to review the Bush administration's decisions to differentiate between "genuine crimes" and "really bad policies".

"If crimes have been committed, they should be investigated," he told the Philadelphia Daily News. "You're also right that I would not want my first term consumed by what was perceived on the part of Republicans as a partisan witch hunt, because I think we've got too many problems we've got to solve."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Sep 4th, 2008 at 03:02:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Nice.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Thu Sep 4th, 2008 at 04:04:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
A sop to the Impeachment crowd, or a real change of position, or a revelation of previously hidden intentions?

At any rate, I believe it when I see it.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Thu Sep 4th, 2008 at 04:36:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Same here, but after Kerry's refusal to admit he wanted to be anything other than George Bush during the 2004 race, this is nice to see.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Thu Sep 4th, 2008 at 05:17:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It could undermine Mr Obama's message of bipartisanship.

I knew the Tories were seeking to project a kinder, gentler image, but are they really pushing the idea that prosecuting violent crimes is something only crazy lefties would think of doing?

by MarekNYC on Thu Sep 4th, 2008 at 04:39:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No, what they're saying is that republicans should be able to get away with torture and murder. IOKIYAR is always true.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Sep 4th, 2008 at 05:00:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
'Bipartisan' = 'Whatever Republicans want, whenever they want it'
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Sep 4th, 2008 at 05:17:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
bi-partisan = Democrats supporting Republican ideas

partisan = Democrats not supporting the samedivisive = id
Shrill = id


In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Fri Sep 5th, 2008 at 03:33:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
At the very least, I'm glad this is being talked about in public.

As always with the Dems: Baby steps.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Fri Sep 5th, 2008 at 06:46:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series