Display:
It would be interesting to hear what the China/India differences are, though. Do they spring from attitudes to peasant farming? Are those attitudes determined by different long-term cultural values, or does the Chinese reorganisation of agriculture under Mao and following explain less resistance than in India? Or is it a mistake to think Chinese peasants are submissive to central government/business policies?

It's not a diary, it's a book ;)

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Sep 7th, 2008 at 04:08:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
that's the problem, it's not a diary it is so many huge issues. The only issue regarding India I know much about is water managment, but that is in itself illustrative. Remote, bureacratic, wasteful and corrupt only scratches the surfaces of the woes caused by it.

although an awful lot of people have been enthused by the politicians who promote India as a place to do business, I've read far too much about the unresovable problems associated with Indian bureaucracy, intransigence, indifference and corruption to believe the coutnry could ever truly leap forward as China has done.

You might say that means they have dodged the bullet of the real problems china has caused for itself (as you know, I predict it will implode within a decade), but India has chosen its own path to hell and is pursuing it vigorously.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Sep 7th, 2008 at 05:43:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Maybe India being a democracy (as strange as it is) plays a role?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sun Sep 7th, 2008 at 05:50:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This plays a huge role, one which many players would rather not talk about as it brings the political nature of economic decisions into sharp relief.

India's democracy is by no stretch of the imagination perfect, but it does function, and it can be lead to truly radical change on occasion.  Witness Kerala, which was taken over by communists via the ballot box, who then ran an effectively socialist government for over ten years.  They pushed through effective educational reform, tax reform, and land reform.

Horrible for entrenched business elites, but democratic nonetheless, and thus an example the business elites would rather ignore.  

This kind of action is not possible in all places, but the very existence of democratic institutions in a country with degrees of family and tribal social organization unknown in the west, and thus with vast potential for coherent democratic agitation from the civil sphere, means that elites can't just push people around at will.

by Zwackus on Sun Sep 7th, 2008 at 06:28:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series