Display:
It's not surprise, just consternation.

The irony of the political spectrum that you give is its inaccuracy.  Americans are willing to move to the Left, they just lack leadership.

I swear, I'm to the point that I've thought that maybe it's time to get to work organizing local chapters of something like Die Linke here.  I'm not voting for Obama, I'm going to be writing in my vote for Nader, mostly to express my dissatisfaction with what the Democratic party has deemed to offer up this time around.

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg

by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Mon Sep 8th, 2008 at 10:43:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You're in a key swing state, so your vote really matters. If McCain wins, I expect no criticism of his policies. We attack Iran - that's what you voted for. Supreme Court with a far right majority for a generation and all the decisions that come from that - including, by the way, the hamstringing of any possibility of the major move to left you claim you want - again, that's what you're voting for. Further deterioration of America's fucked health care system - that's what you're voting for.

There are two choices available. That's it. If you didn't like Obama, the time to work against him was in the primaries. I did. The 'heightening the contradictions' strategy is both morally questionable and very unlikely to work. For one thing, it's more likely to push the Dems to the right rather than the left. Nader ain't leadership, he's a Repub funded concern troll working on their behalf, just like the PUMA's.  Take a good look at how Dem legislators from swing areas voted after 2000 - did they move left? Eight years after 2000, with all that happened, you'd have to be a fool to think that electing Republicans will make things better.

If you've got the energy for it, organize where you are on a local level to try to move the Democrats leftwards. City council, education boards, county dem committees, etc.

by MarekNYC on Mon Sep 8th, 2008 at 11:40:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I will work to move the Democrats leftwards at the local level, but you know what, I've been doing that for the past 10 years, and we still get neo-liberal dipshits like Obama at the head of the national ticket.

Marek, how many people do you know who've been told that the reason that their job was sent overseas was for the better good?

How many people do you personally know who have worked in a factory that has been offshored?

In you own community, what percent of the population knows someone who's suffering hardship because we've been told that there is no alternative (TINA) to voting for the lesser of two evils for the past 20 years?

How many empty lots are there where you live that were once factories that supported thousands of jobs that allowed your friends and family to enter the middle class?

I will not be told to how to vote out of some vague sense that there is no alternative, because when we are held to that standard, there is in fact no alternative.


And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg

by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Mon Sep 8th, 2008 at 06:36:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
'Vague sense that there is no alternative' - There. Is No. Alternative. Not in November. You get to choose between Obama and McCain. A vote for Nader is a half vote for McCain. If you truly beleive that that is the better alternative, go whole hog and vote for McCain, but don't kid yourself. If you didn't live in a key swing state I'd let this go, but you do. Are you so naive as to think that there is no difference between the two. Hell, just the other day you were talking about how you liked Buchanan - someone who apart from his racism is actually to the right of Obama on economics. Are you simply reacting to tone and anger? I don't get it.  

As far as poverty and lost industrial jobs go - guess what, in my area they're long, long gone - they were exported in the fifties to all those places which have been losing factories for the past thirty years.

In any case, traditional industrial labour is not the solution. Productivity keeps going up. Even if we cut our manufactured products imports by half, that would be what - a couple percentage points of GDP, a couple million jobs, at ever decreasing real wages? What we need to do is transform the service sector the way the industrial sector was transformed from the New Deal through the fifties, from poorly paid, crappy jobs, to well paid ones that provided a decent life. We can't go back to the sixties economy.

by MarekNYC on Mon Sep 8th, 2008 at 07:36:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, Man, please...
Look, I hated the choice I had to make at the last French presidential elections (especially hated that the main French newspaper had an editorial just before the first round stating that it would be anti-democratic that the second round be something else than Sarkozy v. Royal. Why have the first round then?). I felt with all my heart that Royal was an appalling candidate.

But not in a million years would I have considered abstention, even though the result was clear. I was not going to have been among those who let Sarkozy happen. Not if you had paid me for it.

With McCain, it's far worse. You may hate Obama (I sure wanted Edwards), but he won't take you to Iran, nor appoint another lunatic fringe extreme right of a Supreme Court judge, who will then deliver the election to the Rightist candidate everytime forever. Please, don't let him happen.
Then I will join you in your vocal complaints that Democrats are way too far to the right. Democrats are not even centrist, and Obama is campaigning as in between the parties, yes, that is awful. But McCain-Palin???

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 9th, 2008 at 01:57:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And you teach..... political science...???  

The problem is this is the real world, not academia!  This is not a test, this is survival, ManfM.  This is not just the, perhaps, last...... chance to turn the US around, but to stop the destruction that it causes worldwide!  It´s not a game to be taken lightly or used as a fancy intellectual vendetta on a whim.

I truly, sincerely, hope you are not serious, or that you will very seriously reconsider.

Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. -Charu Saxena.

by metavision on Mon Sep 8th, 2008 at 04:01:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This is not just the, perhaps, last...... chance to turn the US around, but to stop the destruction that it causes worldwide!

And you really believe that electing Obama will do that?  

I'm sorry, I don't.  

I've been in this game called politics long enough to know when I'm being played, and that, I believe, is precisely the case here.

Electing Obama will change nothing.  

And as for the "moral" obligation to vote for Senator Obama, does electoral relevance also mean that Germans should be forbidden from voting for Die Linke?

Or is the United States the only country who's internal politics should be subject to international condemnation?

I have seen the damage that neo-liberal policies have done to my country, and the only people in the United States who think that this is something new are those who live in protected shells on the coasts who have been largely immune to the consequences of their actions.

Why is it that America is supposed to vote in a milquetoast neo-liberal who may, or may not, oppose further military adventures in order to atone for the world's sins?

As I remember it, there where Spanish troops in those columns that took Baghdad?  Did the Spanish people want that?

Why is it that the Spanish and Italians are exempted from this need for public flagellation while the United States is not?  

Because our government demanded it?  Because there were those who did not fight back?

So we're into collective punishment, now?

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg

by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Mon Sep 8th, 2008 at 06:29:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
does electoral relevance also mean that Germans should be forbidden from voting for Die Linke?

Germany is a PR system with multiple parties. Here we have a choice between two candidates. In European terms what you're doing is the equivalent of writing in the Postman's name in the second round of the French presidential election.

by MarekNYC on Mon Sep 8th, 2008 at 07:41:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series