Display:
See Linca's point, which I think says it very well - 'declining populations needing subsidy' sounds like fear mongering of the 'And then they'll raise for taxes!!!' sort.

It's a stale old talking point. As you say, the numbers don't necessarily add up the way that CW has it.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Sep 8th, 2008 at 01:12:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I most definitely appreciate and agree with Linca's point as well. There are many things wrong with the "ahh, old people will make us bankrupt" argument. And thus many assumptions to challenge. Anyway, it is my opinion that we seem to suffer from some bad over consumption/production as a society, visible in environmental and energy questions. However, in a 'growth first' society, this is not a point that is easily made. This is why I like to make a distinction between 'quality of life' and 'quantity of lifestyle'. Whereas the former can include such things as more time to spend with friends and family, the latter is clearly only a measure of the amount of consumption of fashionable goods one can afford.
by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Mon Sep 8th, 2008 at 01:26:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series