European Tribune

Display:
The bi-annual report on the state of working America is dribbling out on the EPI web site.

Of interest to those here, should be chapter 8, international comparisons.

The relevant site is here:
http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/index.html

Chapter 8:
http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/swa08-ch08-international.pdf

The takeaway is how much the US is an outlier from other developed nations. This includes the wealth disparity as well as the poor level of social services and the weak labor movement.

Data in other chapters shows such things as how life expectancy is correlated to economic status. You get what you pay for in the US, including a longer life.

Policies not Politics
---- Daily Landscape

by rdf (robert.feinman@gmail.com) on Sat Aug 30th, 2008 at 12:22:50 PM EST
The Executive Summary reads like an editorial endorsement for Obama-Biden.  EPI is a 501c.  Glad to see one on the progressive side.

The promises and the pitfalls of the new economy

For the first time since the Census Bureau began tracking such data back in the mid-
1940s, the real incomes of middle-class families are lower at the end of this business cycle
than they were when it started. This fact stands as the single most compelling piece of
evidence that prosperity is eluding working families.
Where has all that productivity growth been going? As this book extensively documents,
it has gone to the top of the income scale, and the higher up you started out, the
better you did. From 1947 to 1979, the top sliver of wage earners made about 20 times that
of the bottom 90%. By 2006, that ratio had catapulted to 77 times more.
Now, there are some smart, hard-working, and creative people up there in that rarified
end of the economic stratosphere, and some deserve large returns for their labors. But they
cannot possibly be the only ones whose living standards should be boosted in a growing
economy. Productivity growth is a result of the efforts of the whole workforce, not just the
fortunate few. Yes, it reflects the work of the CEOs and CFOs at the top of the corporate
ladder. But it also reflects the work of the waitperson who serves those executives their
lunch, the construction worker who builds their homes, the manufacturer who forges the
steel that girds their corporate headquarters, the home health aid who cares for their aging
parents, the cop who protects their beat, and the teacher who educates their kids.



If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.
by ARGeezer (argeezer a in a circle yahoo dot com) on Sat Aug 30th, 2008 at 02:20:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Sat Aug 30th, 2008 at 02:45:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Leonhardt provides an excellent exposition, Jerome.  With respect to ideology Obama appears to be a radical pragmatist.  Replace any part of the ideology that is disfunctional, but replace it with something that works.   Obama's approach, at least as implied in the article, reminds me of John Stuart Mill's observation that, while the market had been shown to be the most effective means of creating wealth, that fact said nothing about how best to distribute that wealth.  

Perhaps some more familiar with the econometric statistics can say whether the current deficit, which the author describes as 2.5% of current GDP, includes the yearly cost of the war in Iraq and the interest on that money.  The other factor that was not discussed is the inheritance tax, the effective repeal of which is due to expire soon.  Should that tax be rejiggered for the very top ends along the lines of the income tax it could, over time, go a long way towards putting the budget into balance and reversing the current trend towards ever increasing concentrations of wealth at the top.  Could trust babies get by on the proceeds of a mere $2,000,000.00 trust fund?  I would think so.

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.

by ARGeezer (argeezer a in a circle yahoo dot com) on Sat Aug 30th, 2008 at 05:05:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So Obama is Center-Right (in EU terms.)  

This is surprising, how?

To forestall ARGeezer ... ;-)

Yeah, if O came out with positions I would enthusiastically support he wouldn't be the nominee.

 

A doo run-run-run, a doo run-run

by ATinNM on Sat Aug 30th, 2008 at 05:43:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
... be the nominee, but the defeat would be of McGovernesque proportions after the corporate media was done with him.

Utsukushikereba sore de ii
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Aug 30th, 2008 at 05:52:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hey!

As a former fanatically devoted volunteer and worker for McGovern who worked his ass off during the campaign that ....

is ...

uh ...

accurate

:-(

:-D

A doo run-run-run, a doo run-run

by ATinNM on Sat Aug 30th, 2008 at 06:04:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
McGovern was the first candidate I was really aware enough of to be able to support ... as an onlooker, mind you, not as a voter ... and even then probably after my parents let us stay up late enough to watch his acceptance speech ...

... and since then I guess I only ever supported the nominee as my first choice in an open primary once, in 2000. From Udall to Gore to Babbit to Edwards ... the ambition reached for in the primary has almost always exceeded the grasp ...

... and the only time my primary pick was the nominee, he won the election but was not sworn in as President, so now I'd probably be nervous if my first choice was, in fact, the nominee.

Utsukushikereba sore de ii

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Aug 30th, 2008 at 06:49:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
... positions I could enthusiastically support.

There are bits and pieces of Obama's policies that I can enthusiastically support. Establishment of an HVDC grid to connect sustainable wind and solar resource areas to the big population centers of the east and west, I'm real enthusiastic about that one. The substantial increase in funding for rail, that one also has my enthusiastic support.

And some of his policies that I only lukewarm support in absolute terms, when placed in relative terms there is no comparison. His Versal Health Care plan (that is, 2/3 of Universal), when compared with McCain's plan for the Healthy and Wealthy and a tax increase on health care spending on everyone else, its clearly by far the better alternative.


Utsukushikereba sore de ii

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Aug 30th, 2008 at 07:04:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That's basically what the EPI is: a half-assed effort by liberals to match the GOP think tanks.  It was cofounded by Robert Reich.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Sat Aug 30th, 2008 at 07:15:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recent Diaries
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series