European Tribune

Display:
On the other hand, the New World has plenty of domesticated plants and animals. The main difference is that European and Far Eastern civilizations were centered on seafaring (Mediterranean, coast of China) while the New World civilization was land-based--so it never "discovered" the rest of the world.

http://transportationhistory.suite101.com/article.cfm/the_inca_and_their_roads

by asdf on Mon Sep 1st, 2008 at 07:25:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But the maize cultivating cultures were also quite a bit later than the wheat and rice cultivating cultures. Probably on account of a) maize being harder to domesticate than wheat and rice and b) South and Central America being divided North-South by its seas and mountain ranges, whereas Europe is divided East-West.

East-West divisions ease the migration of agricultural practises, because they follow the latitude, and thus remain in largely the same climate, whereas North-South migration forces the migrants to cross latitudes, potentially moving them into a different climate belt that renders their crops unfavourable.

The South and Central American cultures had barely five centuries from the first systematic agriculture until they came into contact with comparatively high-tech European culture - with all the predictably nasty outcomes we know. The Europeans had about five millenia of agricultural societies under their belts.

But of course, the convoluted European coastline probably did play a role in making marine transportation so dominant in European culture.

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Sep 3rd, 2008 at 03:13:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series