European Tribune

Display:
Calling things by their names; usually a powerful move. I agree entirely!

Somewhere, I read an article to the effect that the term "fundamentalist" was not applicable to Islam because the history of disputatious biblical exegesis to which it refers does not exist in Islam. I have no idea if that claim makes sense.

by PIGL on Wed Aug 13th, 2008 at 10:06:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
While technically speaking that's probably correct, most of the Christian factions being called "fundamentalists" are not fundamentalist in the technical sense of the term. "Fundamentalism" refers to a specific historical sect/movement within US protestantism, centred around the periodical Fundamentals. I'm a bit hazy on the details of their particular version of theology, but I'm pretty sure that Catholics, for instance, can't be "fundamentalists" in the historical sense of the term.

However, like "evangelical" - and to an even greater extent - it has in common parlance become a catch-all derogatory term for religious wingnuts. And I don't think it's worth the bother to try to salvage the original meaning of the word (at least not outside scholarly discourse).

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Thu Aug 14th, 2008 at 01:52:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
3 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
86 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
12 comments

Help oppose Sarko's three strike nonsense
by nicta - Nov 20
8 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
28 comments

LQD: Geoengineering Ranked
by nanne - Nov 21
36 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
10 comments

So I met Bill McKibben
by SacredCowTipper - Nov 20
3 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series