Display:
To read this in the MSM... wow:

Opinion: Can a Government Lifeline Alone End the Crisis? | Business | Deutsche Welle | 19.09.2008

Greater regulation needed

So the state emerges as the savior. Initial news of the bailout led to a swift recovery. First, profits were privatized and now, losses are being socialized. With the banks saved, the whole game can start over again. That is, unless the government makes stricter regulations for the financial sector part of its rescue program.

 

The sector is always willing to be bailed out, but most unwilling to have regulations imposed on its business dealings. But without stricter monitoring and regulation, such a bailout will only plant the seeds for the next bubble on the financial markets to grow.

 

Karl Zawadzky is DW-RADIO's business editor (dc)



*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Sep 20th, 2008 at 03:22:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
See Section 8 of the Bailout Act


Sec. 8. Review.

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.



In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Sep 21st, 2008 at 03:37:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Lobbyists Scramble to Sway Deal

Titans of the financial industry are battling to influence the government's financial rescue plan, a package that will create new winners and losers in the sector.

Democrats in Congress want a rescue package that benefits homeowners at risk for foreclosure, not just Wall Street. Securities houses don't want executive salary limits for banks that participate in the rescue.

(...)

House Republican staffers met with roughly 15 lobbyists Friday afternoon, whose message to lawmakers was clear: Don't load the legislation up with provisions not directly related to the crisis, or regulatory measures the industry has long opposed.

"We're opposed to adding provisions that will affect [or] undermine the deal substantively," said Scott Talbott, senior vice president of government affairs at the Financial Services Roundtable, whose members include the nation's largest banks, securities firms and insurers.

A deal killer for the group: a proposal that would grant bankruptcy judges new powers to lower the principal, interest rate or both on a mortgage as part of a bankruptcy proceeding.

Give us the money and don't tell us what to do with it. Or else.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Sep 21st, 2008 at 04:09:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Fed has apparently consulted with the Bank of Finland on the Finnish Junk Bank set up after the early 90s financial crash.

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Sep 21st, 2008 at 04:31:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This should be done as a debt/equity swap.

Example: Lehman had

liabilities of $613 billion and assets worth $639 billion. But nobody trusted the quality of those assets.
The net equity was $20bn. Suppose 10% of the assets are bad loans. The government appears to be ready to replace $64bn of assets with cash or treasury bonds. It should instead buy $64bn worth of equity, giving it 70% of the net equity in the resulting "healthy" company.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Sep 21st, 2008 at 05:33:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That is unconstitutional, I bet.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Sep 21st, 2008 at 05:18:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Does anyone care?

Anyone 'serious', I mean.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sun Sep 21st, 2008 at 05:27:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series